From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C4A1381FA for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EAE2E0A61; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15C63E0968 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.173.147.84] (85-76-37-17-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.37.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CDB633FD44 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <538F15F6.6040900@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:49:58 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower References: <20140603161406.0400709b5f38540475ac4c1f@web.de> <6653474.aQqAYpAeto@wstn> <538DFC41.3080602@libertytrek.org> <538E2CBA.4000709@gmail.com> <538E37A0.1030105@marc-stuermer.de> <538E40E6.8060107@gmail.com> <538E591B.4020708@jsbc.cc> <538E6F1A.2070209@gmx.us> <538E7AEF.9060006@gmx.us> <538E7D21.6090907@mackal.net> <538E81B1.90101@gmx.us> <538E9AF1.3090709@gentoo.org> <538F016E.4090606@admin-box.com> <538F0DC7.9090004@admin-box.com> In-Reply-To: <538F0DC7.9090004@admin-box.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 110859a7-c01f-4d7f-9094-9301cbed988e X-Archives-Hash: db633e3f5e7541e9aa88dfca5932384a On 04/06/14 15:15, Daniel Troeder wrote: > Am 04.06.2014 13:22, schrieb Daniel Troeder: >> Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen: >>> On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >>>> No, "sys-fs/udev" is not masked, but an update is indicated in the >>>> emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff is from the overlay. >>>> Unfortunately, the xfce stuff is not, so even if the overlay currency >>>> was an issue, I'll still be showing some dependencies. >>>> >>> Try re-emerging on un-emerging the offending packages, like >>> xfce4-session and xfce4-power-manager, >>> it has helped some people, to refresh the .ebuild copy that is installed >>> with the .ebuild copy from >>> Portage >>> >>> - Samuli >>> >> Thanks - that fixed it for me: >> >> # emerge -C xfce-base/xfce4-session xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager >> xfce-extra/xfce4-systemload-plugin >> # emerge -uND xfce-base/xfce4-meta xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager >> xfce-extra/xfce4-systemload-plugin >> >> >> Greetings >> Daniel >> > BTW: I also had to unmerge gnome-base/gnome-control-center and > gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon and mask all gnome-* >3.10 > > > Yes, GNOME 3.12 is the first desktop in Portage that is forcing >=sys-power/upower-0.99.0, therefore GNOME 3.12 can't be installed together with sys-power/upower-pm-utils It's expected that more and more packages will start requiring >=sys-power/upower-0.99.0, so this sys-power/upower-pm-utils, is to be considered as a temporary solution, specially considering it has no upstream anymore So, if package you need sys-power/upower-pm-utils for, doesn't migrate it's code like Xfce did and directly use sys-power/pm-utils, so that it allows 0.99.0 installation, the package is bound to die That's the whole point of this requirement for manual intervention of user, he needs to make an informed decision what route he wants to go -- like extreme route, such as switching desktops from LXDE to Xfce, and such (This reply is not directly aimed at you, but to whole thread, just trying to raise public awareness, because maybe it will get someone to actually contribute some code to improve the situation) - Samuli