From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B351381FA for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B182CE09FA; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.no-carrier.info (kraftzwerg.no-carrier.info [87.98.242.129]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE03E095A for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.no-carrier.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B4A2041EE for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:00:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.42 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.42 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, CRM114_CHECK=0.08, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_THREADED=-1.5] autolearn=no X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( -1.60 ) X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20140603_220052_517085_2598D520 Received: from mail.no-carrier.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.no-carrier.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yWiIHXYbaYkk for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:00:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p5490CC10.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.144.204.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@marc-stuermer.de) by mail.no-carrier.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC0BB200945 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 22:00:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=marc-stuermer.de; s=tsunami; t=1401825641; bh=Erpt+2oznLTS4nFx3ICAVdWibbZkDsHAlklzHAOw7qs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a4ODg6vnOotg5eu2MT0FOpJtXgaULl/Zqo5Fqf986YmlzUsSvo2WapnzEhQcE/uRC AYeDOSNzTahju5rh7vGM5YL8IL/pNVyVNs3IOLrXPYbLsEvCF8+qKXdbtA/8oZA++s vUeF6PvTxqxs+Y10GVRAJGM/vVAklHUxEDLsshjI= Message-ID: <538E293B.2060608@marc-stuermer.de> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:59:55 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYyBTdMO8cm1lcg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? References: <538B1D0A.9070405@libertytrek.org> <538D7689.4070900@marc-stuermer.de> <538D9CB1.2090402@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: <538D9CB1.2090402@libertytrek.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: eaf763bf-68d5-477e-8e4f-3b514e482ad4 X-Archives-Hash: e87f1d6ed1bf23a17cabc1dd6b0257af Am 03.06.2014 12:00, schrieb Tanstaafl: >> So no loss at all if TrueCrypt would really cease to exist. > > Which totally misses the point of *how* it happened. How it happened is strange and you can make many theories about it. The more interesting question about it for sure is: why did many people trust such an anonymous development team at all?