From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6321381FA for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B10FE09C1; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (mail-wg0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382E5E09B9 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x13so5462622wgg.10 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N6ebTURcap2E2atbQvIPulUURriY4APWOcK9yoCtJHU=; b=xey2uuvJJQB11FGKY5zFuc66CjZi1XGxt6P9c42s5qoScAud7ByJ3Ye+gAtQriSWl6 OMjXbkt57zVcPi5/ui8Xo4Nh0eklW1WhfWFsNo52SOyhy0D5+aqVEtsAfn7jwXXIt8qt nvxc9x40zJMY5nOYGzdyDF4JV/GHOTPJ/fTaHSgg8OiKxB5QwcpFDSlXK73v1W1MOvGe rt/2H5j31CsjTlCH/6aP03D7eZPd9uRSKL9rKRFcekW/TTqCsy5h0OAftvrYoiJUM3SH jFQPGJxzut39HbADLGHEjpPI1JCcAn0+CH+FCoze0onWzHU0N79Jp4wN7UgD5VSAkw+e TuRg== X-Received: by 10.194.240.129 with SMTP id wa1mr51411174wjc.11.1401728090851; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pD952C662.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.82.198.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bn10sm34014627wib.7.2014.06.02.09.54.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <538CAC57.2000104@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:54:47 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? References: <538B1D0A.9070405@libertytrek.org> <538B66A1.6070106@googlemail.com> <538C344E.6050809@gmail.com> <538C42D3.6050205@googlemail.com> <20140602103422.39856e78@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <538C485F.5070901@gmail.com> <538C4C9A.5080107@gmail.com> <538C51A0.8050903@gmail.com> <20140602115624.214cbdbe@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140602115624.214cbdbe@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 738ceecb-195c-4185-877c-121f4172b3ae X-Archives-Hash: 1a01040e3ef07f908cb433ca2bd02378 Am 02.06.2014 12:56, schrieb Neil Bothwick: > On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:27:44 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> The second option does sound what I am looking for. Basically, if I log >> out but leave my computer on, leave home, some crook/NSA type breaks in >> and tries to access something or steals my whole puter, they would just >> get garbage for data. That seems to fit the second option best. > If they steal your computer they will have to power it off, unless you > are kind enough to leave them a large enough UPS to steal along with it, > so any encryption will be equally effective. > > if they go so far to steal his box, they will probably be willing to use some rubber hose attacks to break the key...