From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-156007-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9D91381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 May 2014 19:57:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 047C4E083D;
	Mon, 26 May 2014 19:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DECA7E0827
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 May 2014 19:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB3F125D2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 May 2014 21:57:22 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout;
	t=1401134242; bh=uwmrB/CM6mRjl80RsMlb6WSHzvSpuyXJw+MRlAdh0kk=;
	h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=ALrFJbmInXJwiSLYPW3j9JG77PHPG7ObtZvzzrqw+rAASUoW2xLgYGmq5Dmq7PEud
	 UBe49LlSUVH8DupzCuX8h0l4lhxi9I50CgcVH0gYn2HGSu7m6KeV7pDmKvgT02S4Ld
	 VWhdBRldOLQJdwgtUJHQKbe8ZX16A1VtMQCZkipw=
Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 14511-06 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
 Mon, 26 May 2014 21:57:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hiro.oops.intern (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:20f7:df10:2dfd:d641])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BD33123ED
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 May 2014 21:57:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout;
	t=1401134240; bh=uwmrB/CM6mRjl80RsMlb6WSHzvSpuyXJw+MRlAdh0kk=;
	h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=K9zXaAQGBv7xG8IoNQ0Lu/oUIToxv8dRNVkw/Ae/b2EODiwVeA3GQUGJGKR1ZHDoG
	 UxQk2xRyGJ5PkBAOQfCS70thEnped5RW+E+VeLBQJv3Eg0dAos8zn5wx19WQTZtAe0
	 C3Zq4RM+GMY+eLMNQACXXW7NATjsmfYwDFqu1TNg=
Message-ID: <53839C9F.8040509@xunil.at>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 21:57:19 +0200
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at>
Organization: oops!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Intel(R) C600 SAS Controller
References: <537EFE48.70804@xunil.at> <5380F1F9.7030105@xunil.at> <53837E48.40208@xunil.at>
In-Reply-To: <53837E48.40208@xunil.at>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c
X-Archives-Salt: 438089be-8201-4cfc-8286-f42a6062ad65
X-Archives-Hash: 093c7e41e3a65045c7b5960e3400a769

Am 26.05.2014 19:47, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:

> But I somehow think the performance is sub-optimal.

virt-backup is slow as well (using dd and gzip or pigz in my own patched
version). Yes, that LVM stuff again ...

I run 6 SAS disks and built hardware raids.

Should I look into the cache settings there?


way too slow ...