public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  btrfs conversion: first impressions
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:01:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <537322E6.9040907@xunil.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514013910.37678e36@digimed.co.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 14.05.2014 02:39, schrieb Neil Bothwick:

>> Doesn't that screw up the whole idea of checksumming etc ?
> 
> Not to my mind. The bits are recorded and checksummed, that's what 
> matters. If a bit on a platter is flipped, the decrypted bits will
> also change.

But then the "container" of the btrfs would be corrupted, right?

>> In my understanding the FS (=btrfs or zfs) should have the
>> direct contact to the "metal" (=hdd/sdd) to be fully able to
>> detect bitrot and stuff.
> 
> It is a recommended method of encryption in the BTRFS FAQ.
> 
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Does_btrfs_support_encryption.3F
>
>  As btrfs does not support encryption itself, this or ecryptfs are
> the only options.

Yes, I saw that as well. Will give it a try sometimes soon ...

S

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=dRlH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-14  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-06 10:18 [gentoo-user] planned btrfs conversion: questions Marc Joliet
2014-05-06 18:13 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2014-05-06 23:30   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-06 22:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Marc Joliet
2014-05-07 15:12   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-09 21:05   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-06 22:56 ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-06 23:51   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-08 11:57     ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-08 18:14       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-09 19:59         ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-10 11:14           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-11 12:35             ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-11 16:17               ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-11 17:37                 ` Peter Humphrey
2014-05-11 21:24                 ` [gentoo-user] btrfs conversion: first impressions Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-12 14:30                   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 18:28                     ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-13 22:34                       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-13 23:02                         ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-13 23:09                           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-14  0:39                             ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-14  8:01                               ` Stefan G. Weichinger [this message]
2014-05-14  8:42                                 ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-14  8:54                                   ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-14  9:26                                     ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-14  9:30                                       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-15  6:17                                         ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-12 11:19                 ` [gentoo-user] planned btrfs conversion: questions Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-08 20:43       ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-10  9:33       ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-11  8:53         ` Mick
2014-05-11 10:43           ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-11 12:29             ` Peter Humphrey
2014-05-11 15:53               ` Alan McKinnon
2014-05-12 14:08           ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 14:39             ` Peter Humphrey
2014-05-12 15:04               ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 16:15                 ` Dale
2014-05-12 19:12                   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 19:28                 ` Daniel Frey
2014-05-07  2:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Jonathan Callen
2014-05-16 20:15 ` [gentoo-user] experience thus far (was: planned btrfs conversion: questions) Marc Joliet
2014-05-16 20:43   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-17  0:08   ` [gentoo-user] experience thus far William Kenworthy
2014-05-17  0:44     ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-17  3:02     ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-17  7:53       ` Mick
2014-05-17 11:41         ` Rich Freeman
2014-05-17 10:07     ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-17 12:35       ` William Kenworthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=537322E6.9040907@xunil.at \
    --to=lists@xunil.at \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox