public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  btrfs conversion: first impressions
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 23:24:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536FEA92.1080502@xunil.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536FA2A4.4040205@xunil.at>


After some initial learning and fiddling I have to say that I really
like the features and possibilities of btrfs so far.

OK, features bring complexity as well ... some technology hides that
more, some less.

... but it is really nice-to-have the option to snapshot your root-fs,
do-something-to-it (emerge unstable stuff, delete the wrong files, you
name it ...), and if you don't like it you simply boot using your
snapshot ... that is actually really helpful and also rather easy once
you get your head wrapped around the concepts and the few steps
necessary (and it's quick: the snapshot is done in a blink ...)

No specific benchmarks done here, the internet is full of ... so far the
performance was not noticeable different from the ext4-fs before. This
might be more visible with hdds, I only used SSDs so far.

As far as I researched btrfs seems to be quite reliable in a not too
complex (read: multi devices) setup ... and backups never hurt anyway.

As I do backups all the time I feel quite confident to test my setups
for the next few days and maybe even completely overhaul my desktop setup.

-> 2x 1TB HDDs plus 1x 256GB SSD (plus the one older 80GB SSD for tests
right now) ... with LVM and stuff (remember my hassles last week with
the LVMs not activated??) ... I could run one btrfs-pool on the 2 HDDs
and one on the SSD and cut all of my various filesystems out of that.

Would mixing hdds and the ssd into one pool make sense? I think, no ... ?

--

I will also test running VMs on btrfs-subvolumes and doing snapshots:

snapshot the underlying subvolume, apply some changes within the VM and
then rollback to the snapshot.

This would remove LVM-snapshotting out of the way ... etc etc

As mentioned before, looking forward ... and curious!

Stefan



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-11 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-06 10:18 [gentoo-user] planned btrfs conversion: questions Marc Joliet
2014-05-06 18:13 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2014-05-06 23:30   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-06 22:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Marc Joliet
2014-05-07 15:12   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-09 21:05   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-06 22:56 ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-06 23:51   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-08 11:57     ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-08 18:14       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-09 19:59         ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-10 11:14           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-11 12:35             ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-11 16:17               ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-11 17:37                 ` Peter Humphrey
2014-05-11 21:24                 ` Stefan G. Weichinger [this message]
2014-05-12 14:30                   ` [gentoo-user] btrfs conversion: first impressions Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 18:28                     ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-13 22:34                       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-13 23:02                         ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-13 23:09                           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-14  0:39                             ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-14  8:01                               ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-14  8:42                                 ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-14  8:54                                   ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-14  9:26                                     ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-14  9:30                                       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-15  6:17                                         ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-12 11:19                 ` [gentoo-user] planned btrfs conversion: questions Stefan G. Weichinger
2014-05-08 20:43       ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-10  9:33       ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-11  8:53         ` Mick
2014-05-11 10:43           ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-11 12:29             ` Peter Humphrey
2014-05-11 15:53               ` Alan McKinnon
2014-05-12 14:08           ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 14:39             ` Peter Humphrey
2014-05-12 15:04               ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 16:15                 ` Dale
2014-05-12 19:12                   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-12 19:28                 ` Daniel Frey
2014-05-07  2:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Jonathan Callen
2014-05-16 20:15 ` [gentoo-user] experience thus far (was: planned btrfs conversion: questions) Marc Joliet
2014-05-16 20:43   ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-17  0:08   ` [gentoo-user] experience thus far William Kenworthy
2014-05-17  0:44     ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-17  3:02     ` William Kenworthy
2014-05-17  7:53       ` Mick
2014-05-17 11:41         ` Rich Freeman
2014-05-17 10:07     ` Neil Bothwick
2014-05-17 12:35       ` William Kenworthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536FEA92.1080502@xunil.at \
    --to=lists@xunil.at \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox