From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FF61381FA for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 18:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B93E4E09EA; Thu, 8 May 2014 18:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7385E09B0 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 18:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A9D2DC61 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 20:14:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1399572855; bh=qocToKoWIYYvRkW6AVZ7wvPQOZI+ce+n5v+BwB4ssxE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Q+A57JgdX1qoUGG/zB95UIn+3Rjuuo5pdBS/9A+5yRQu/uzOt3bDul5fY++kXHZWM KaW5Z+VP23zJrKLYeI1mUu9J4M/reovDJce1boNKUFVSY+444A/OpMNH+m3Zr2y60Q KPRIpGy6K0bZEneGvVnzgk3tE8TdYkn6108sP5Ag= Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 31032-07 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 20:14:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:306a:b863:7002:ad53] (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:306a:b863:7002:ad53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EDF22DC65 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 20:14:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1399572853; bh=qocToKoWIYYvRkW6AVZ7wvPQOZI+ce+n5v+BwB4ssxE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=GwllO4kchtdxdJtMW0+5zTJCoBMdMJpC0j9BN9JCkjFfGxniMu850WLCb25bnIwFN 892emKhi8IyI+9PJklbd9OdoyUSeKRUXwFzxJpkmThhNBaXP+nV0OEFhRer2vEuA6S U3LBtyaKxbUyZDGAijvaPOqwV09DuEAvyHT7lBF8= Message-ID: <536BC974.9090200@xunil.at> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 20:14:12 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] planned btrfs conversion: questions References: <20140506121832.678ae781@marcec> <5369688C.1040708@iinet.net.au> <20140507015126.5b57fb88@marcec> <536B712E.3040009@iinet.net.au> In-Reply-To: <536B712E.3040009@iinet.net.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c X-Archives-Salt: 66565881-5c6f-40f7-aa0e-5308f2544e74 X-Archives-Hash: 93fe175c0f6800a25560823ad0769d6b Am 08.05.2014 13:57, schrieb William Kenworthy: > I have had had very poor luck with ext anything and would hesitate it to > recommend it except for this very specific case where there is little > alternative - reiserfs is far better on platters for instance. I would be interested in your experience with ext anything. Poor luck "only" ? IMO the extX-filesystems are stable and recommended in general. And I use them in a lot of places if I dont't have specific reasons to do otherwise. Stefan