From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00FE1381FA for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 20:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60F36E0B1E; Sat, 3 May 2014 20:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27075E0AB5 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 20:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5772DC41 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 22:23:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1399148592; bh=HIu/K6IPPpwTLj37ZJbd1ahudzJmBowkLzvN2AlNLxs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fc2AZ7ov7fY072B0A49EyTUxI4Um+a11l/FOg+ZyPL3AxcPEI1JRLMacsTHB0QS86 U2wl16EnOCCef4z2PUIIVZ3uAGGWG5V8xybG4c8lVmpoHhQqutQ/r/TX6CRCNbgEAY +wxKr728fQp9oom3V4zJTgxUf5pssbViUKVbAng8= Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 10269-05 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 22:23:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hiro.oops.intern (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:d1f8:f63a:49c7:240a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE9E2167 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 22:23:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1399148589; bh=HIu/K6IPPpwTLj37ZJbd1ahudzJmBowkLzvN2AlNLxs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=xKa+peNnCFzke93nXMHQm6xMC0jKZ9GQTrzattVgxSFjuj92D76RcdAySlaCTXEYF GJvZv1WjH5KCC6LTm6ZpfP75BilGTFeBBqnkTSqw7Sl/FBZuQjpo3M5h50WldjMt1M OOcWk51DtdOMeZZG5xAyK9GMnisKav+Msf+lMuE4= Message-ID: <5365502C.6090608@xunil.at> Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 22:23:08 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] boot problems References: <5364C0F9.3000906@xunil.at> <2219291.LPmZhmqkJ1@andromeda> <536545AB.2060008@xunil.at> <53654930.6080701@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: <53654930.6080701@xunil.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c X-Archives-Salt: 918cb191-534a-466c-9a7f-45f9870c6462 X-Archives-Hash: 5fd22fb1a048c134c59e984da99f0c11 Am 03.05.2014 21:53, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> As per the bug you posted, can you show us the contents of your >> initramfs, to check that the LVM binaries are included? And confirm >> that the binaries are the same as in your normal system? > > Hm, yes ... I was a bit faster and already applied that patch ... and > had a successful boot with activated and mounted LVs ... currently > rebuilding some gdm/gnome-shell .... etc > > I will reboot without all the debug-stuff for testing ... and then maybe > remove the patch and test 3.14.x > > ... and I will get a beer now. This is gentoo-testers, not gentoo-users > here :-P Back again, booted successfully ... with latest gentoo-sources, systemd, dracut, lvm2 ... and the mentioned patch. If you check the link there is already a small discussion started ... it is 10pm here and I am happy and tired after this day of fighting and booting ... :-) -- so I will skip testing the removal of the patch for now, if you allow ;-) So I got some decent cleanup today ... removed one of the RAID-arrays (obsolete/unused), redid my fstab completely and modified the whole dracut/grub2/kerninst-setup ... phew! So my lvm2-lines aren't "kinda old" anymore, see fstab down there for checks ... I wonder if I should keep or remove the option "comment=systemd.automount" ? I thought it would help to start up faster while the non-important (in terms of boot-process) filesystems get fscked and mounted in background. Something to test tomorrow ;-) LABEL=ROOT / ext4 noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 1 /dev/disk/by-uuid/10ccf5a2-0a37-42a6-886a-146e01cab301 none swap defaults 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 tmpfs /tmp tmpfs mode=1777 0 0 tmpfs /var/tmp/portage tmpfs size=8000m,mode=1777 0 0 /dev/cdrw /media/cdrecorder auto user,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 LABEL=HOME /home ext4 noatime,user_xattr 0 2 LABEL=distfiles /usr/portage/distfiles xfs noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 2 LABEL=dropbox /mnt/dropbox ext4 noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 2 LABEL=gentoo32 /mnt/gentoo32 ext4 noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 2 LABEL=media /mnt/media ext4 noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 2 LABEL=music /mnt/music ext4 noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 2 LABEL=platz /mnt/platz ext4 noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 2 LABEL=oopsfiles /mnt/oopsfiles ext4 noatime,comment=systemd.automount 0 2 Thanks to all of you who responded and helped along this odyssey ;-) ... I will check back for open ends in this thread and reply some missing parts later (next days). Looking forward to how these bugs develop ... Greetings, best regards, Stefan