From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A585F1381FA for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 12:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A088BE0B49; Sat, 3 May 2014 12:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA33E0B23 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 12:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9812DC41 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 14:27:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1399120038; bh=Ezbb+R+d+zQC2tphvhrnvbQeTovkHVhwnB3guO/y34g=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=dCLvHWIzQ3PzXP8QCynsJZql1cz3vFRCkT8/u+spWLJrJmS/uAeYEaNDuW7dwVmOL OcGDNLjgifGxeHUBmve3bMdhT5PsNmmacKZ+0cGx24mLnz5aIglxoYi6pUDYJEZex3 EiloEAC+hqTBpiR0QwCBNQwCgMFdFmyO7k0QFH6w= Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 20999-06 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 14:27:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hiro.oops.intern (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:f9f1:ff70:52fc:e196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1929F1573E for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 14:27:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1399120036; bh=Ezbb+R+d+zQC2tphvhrnvbQeTovkHVhwnB3guO/y34g=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=loTHinRiFWZ2jvD9o8jvbwGZCXx/mxexdNM4SV6rqGdMfIBOkAFlbimRuTxHfjh2h 5AI8cpumrl46pZhHj+y2puB0ls3r6BQAo/qNirZddMd9OjVBZCPAanR56CX0LrW1h1 E3uRah8yT1OT0gWtqVN39O6gEUsHo5NLKlSW+IwM= Message-ID: <5364E0A3.3000203@xunil.at> Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 14:27:15 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] boot problems References: <5364C0F9.3000906@xunil.at> <1408053.9yvCLYqSXs@andromeda> <5364CF2D.80407@xunil.at> <6539833.TvPLtO1q9n@andromeda> <5364D25F.5040004@xunil.at> <5364D55A.7020106@xunil.at> <5364DC3A.5060801@xunil.at> <20140503121737.GQ8451@ns1.bonedaddy.net> In-Reply-To: <20140503121737.GQ8451@ns1.bonedaddy.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c X-Archives-Salt: a385d1df-8528-45e1-9d75-359c906995c7 X-Archives-Hash: 961580986714bb4adf52abc4e9e44973 Am 03.05.2014 14:17, schrieb Todd Goodman: > * Stefan G. Weichinger [140503 08:09]: >> Am 03.05.2014 13:39, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> >>> Booted with "rd.auto=1" and now I also get a funny start job >>> running/waiting for /dev/sda1 (/ on the SSD). >>> >>> Oh my! :-) >>> >>> pasta now. >> >> So, back from speed-lunch now ;-) >> >> While cooking the pasta I got a bit further: >> >> Box boots now with kernel 3.14.1 and with commented LVs in fstab. >> >> When I login and check there are no mdadm-raids assembled. >> >> When I "mdadm -A --scan" they get correctly assembled: >> >> >> # cat /proc/mdstat >> Personalities : [raid1] >> md4 : active raid1 sdb3[0] sdc6[2] >> 52395904 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] >> >> md1 : active raid1 sdb6[0] sdc3[1] >> 623963072 blocks [2/2] [UU] >> >> (Don't ask for the strange setup with sdb3/sdc6 and sdb6/sdc3, >> historically grown somehow ...) >> >> "vgchange -ay" then gets me all my LVs. Great so far. >> >> So the question is, what part of the whole setup should now assemble the >> arrays? >> >> I think, dracut, right? >> >> So I will now test booting with these funny "rd.auto" kernel line >> parameters ... >> >> Has mdadm.service to be enabled as well? Or is that redundant in a way? >> >> Stefan > > FWIW, I have a similar problem with mdadm and dracut and do something > similarly to what's described in: > > http://rich0gentoo.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/a-quick-dracut-module/ Thanks for the link .... I will keep it in mind ... for now I try to stay as close to the stuff in portage as possible (and it worked until yesterday ;-) ). S