public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heartbleed fix - question re: replacing self-signed certs with real ones
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:27:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53518AB0.3040802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201404182001.31265.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2872 bytes --]

Mick wrote:
> On Friday 18 Apr 2014 19:08:21 Dale wrote:
>> I'm a little vague on some things but it seems the claim was that NSA
>> had some sort of backdoor that was built in from the beginning of the
>> project for encryption which sounded like it would include httpS and
>> others.  Again, the details are fuzzy.  I would say that I need to
>> bookmark this sort of thing but I already have so many bookmarks that it
>> is very hard to dig through them as it is.  Adding more may be
>> counterproductive, yet again.
>
> I think that you are referring to their Dual_EC_DRBG (Dual Elliptic Curve
> Deterministic Random Bit Generator) which is/was used by RSA Security
(not RSA
> the algorithm developed by Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman).
>
>
http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2295881/rsa-warns-customers-against-nsa-compromised-security-product#
>
> I don't know if Schneier said, stay away from elliptic curve algos and
use
> symmetric keys instead, because of this.  Others have tried to crack
elliptic
> curves and have not been successful - so one has to tread carefully. 
Given
> the NSA/NIST and big corporates are all in it up to their neck, I
would guess
> that distrusting *everything* they have or could be behind is a healthy
> attitude to take at the moment.  ;-)
>

Well, I just wondered if it was true or not.  If the NSA has some sort
of back hack then encryption to them is meaningless.  Thing is, I don't
know if it is true or not.  I wouldn't be surprised if it is for sure.

I try to keep things as secure as I can and protect myself from the bad
guys but this sort of things makes me wonder if it really does much if
any good.  If companies/governments have backdoor ways to get passed it,
then there is no way to know who else can use that too.  All it takes is
for one employee/contractor with the knowledge to decide to sell out and
then the whole thing is compromised.

Imagine if it were to come out that there is a backdoor key to all the
encryption that is currently in use.  That would really throw a wrench
into the whole internet community.  I just read that yet another store
has been hacked into and customer info stolen here in the USA.  Waiting
to see it from a reputable source before getting to deep into it.

Of recent, I have seriously thought of encrypting my /home partition. 
I'm not a crook but like a guy said once in a TV interview, if a person
looks long enough and hard enough, they will find something then build a
career off building the rest.  There are to many laws for anyone to
really be able to safely say they have never broken the law before.

I thought I read that article on Linux Journal but I can't find it there
so it must have been somewhere else.  < shrugs >

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3898 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-18 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-16 10:52 [gentoo-user] Heartbleed fix - question re: replacing self-signed certs with real ones Tanstaafl
2014-04-16 11:14 ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-16 17:56   ` Tanstaafl
2014-04-17  5:59     ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-17  6:10     ` Mick
2014-04-17 14:40       ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-17 15:49         ` Mick
2014-04-17 16:54           ` Joe User
2014-04-17 18:43           ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-17 20:17             ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2014-04-18  5:50               ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-18 14:27                 ` Dale
2014-04-18 16:45                   ` Mick
2014-04-18 18:08                     ` Dale
2014-04-18 19:01                       ` Mick
2014-04-18 20:27                         ` Dale [this message]
2014-04-18 23:33                           ` Mick
2014-04-19 15:29                             ` Dale
2014-04-19 15:43                               ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-19 19:33                                 ` Dale
2014-04-19 19:43                                   ` Joe User
2014-04-19 21:23                                     ` Dale
2014-04-20  0:18                                 ` Peter Humphrey
2014-04-20  8:49                                   ` Mick
2014-04-20  9:21                                     ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-20 10:26                                       ` Mick
2014-04-19 16:11                               ` Mick
2014-04-19 18:41                                 ` Dale
2014-04-20  8:27                                   ` Mick
2014-04-20  9:10                                     ` Dale
2014-04-20 12:38                                       ` Mick
2014-04-20 16:40                                         ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-20 17:20                                           ` Joe User
2014-04-21  6:57                                             ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-20 18:36                                         ` Dale
2014-04-19 11:51             ` [gentoo-user] " Mick
2014-04-19 13:17               ` Joe User
2014-04-19 15:38                 ` Matti Nykyri
2014-04-19 16:40                   ` Joe User
2014-04-19 17:14                 ` Mick
2014-04-20 23:20                 ` Mick
2014-04-21  7:11                   ` Matti Nykyri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53518AB0.3040802@gmail.com \
    --to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox