From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-154986-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A9E138A1F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:42:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FC4AE0B5E;
	Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:42:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BB5E0B51
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:42:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (tor-exit0-readme.dfri.se [171.25.193.20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 242E3340046
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:42:44 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53470237.50700@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:42:31 +0000
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What MTA to use to receiving mail for local
 users?
References: <li6dhq$ve9$1@ger.gmane.org> <5346BB91.6050101@googlemail.com> <2001344.Tj9ai7rZE4@wstn> <li6tqc$s3l$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <li6tqc$s3l$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 7cb1d8e9-9464-4a37-9189-af40b9841a89
X-Archives-Hash: f3554b4abb2f348c18c0e8e899e8c070

Grant Edwards:
> On 2014-04-10, Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Thursday 10 Apr 2014 17:41:05 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>
>>> well, IMHO postfix is pretty easy to setup up. While sendmail is a
>>> complete nightmare.
>>
>> I've just about got it set up here, so it can't be too hard.
>>
>>> Exim&qmail - never touched those.
>>
>> Are they even still maintained?
> 
> According to http://bugs.exim.org, bugs were still being resolved 9
> days ago (though the most recent bug _fix_ was 5 weeks ago).
> 
> qmail hasn't been touched since 2007, so it seems to be abandoned.
> 

good to know it's still in stable arch... ugh