From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29570139077 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66BD7E0ABD; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5776EE0AB2 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (exit-01c.noisetor.net [173.254.216.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 760B833FD8E for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <530E8F4F.3090207@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:05:19 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fwd:How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? References: <5297F0C8.3060403@gmail.com> <5305410B.1090403@gmail.com> <20140220102952.GA6784@sabayon.logifi> <20140220205207.a1f2f6077cfbc037ae9b0bdb@gmail.com> <20140220204103.GA3381@vidovic.ultras.lan> <53066CCF.3060509@gmail.com> <53075F65.8050505@gentoo.org> <20140226105547.GD4096@sabayon.logifi> <530E0248.2020401@gentoo.org> <20140226152655.GG4096@sabayon.logifi> In-Reply-To: <20140226152655.GG4096@sabayon.logifi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: accde2f4-f84d-4c9f-966e-8aa808f64f06 X-Archives-Hash: eb4da15b8ebdd9ed5c793b744adc4942 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Nicolas Sebrecht: > The 26/02/14, hasufell wrote: > >> I wasn't only talking about modules and yes... loading them on >> demand actually proves my point. > > No. We are talking about servers. > I am aware of that. Please read the whole discussion. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTDo9PAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzbVYH/2O8ILmj6D2BmA+NUWwLxbMK hEyx7t+jZ1oVEnQAVjmnj4n4ylLKAH0qawl7fI2tBjfyXmw68pxItyqw0V3FdHl8 Zf6l/v7hVxTcJpMbF8Lk27BPMIBh8PpOm1A/A1G5eb3NGlMQht3zZa4QhUZkoU+U rVHXVFfSeKyzNYFiRIfdD/dsGXHfqj5Z2PKAqxrjRYo7EdLcHhrJJ/3X1MczOOcf n04vNbPSVCaer4WN5cqLG9bgJVnjVjhzF7bKwkjTjezwedEI969PCBHT0SZWN0mg 7vTEJzfykglcQ7PDJ/PPRgt8gwoFQCU1U7x/NAaANOQfoiCTHoffpwtVOf7XyUQ= =LwNB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----