From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C6B138E20 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C81AE0CE4; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaacfa.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.250]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9876EE0CD5 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC1D480D0 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 05:49:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=wJzN7gJ/Yd3KU2Ne4YCu5ecx83U=; b=nE/SbdG84JqH pN6ElnwGWFNnQQu3mmP4NnOyRZ51hFEwwnwCMwE5zd8w62HNmSeq2OUPlXuIdVBw IJ1dSK7rVFawuaPpoOuOQyFaFIvVnDpdWd+1N6EzDgGQ/dq8eiDHQ+Nynn/QhDMN As+jxXM5U11UvuhlwhGQtDs1qLKlDoE= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE80A4809E for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 05:49:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5307595D.4050803@libertytrek.org> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:49:17 -0500 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? References: <5297F0C8.3060403@gmail.com> <5305410B.1090403@gmail.com> <53054E16.70708@gmail.com> <5305EF52.7030303@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a85ff973-123f-4df7-84fd-3564f8084a79 X-Archives-Hash: 8e815b5672940dcdac15271e3c48820d On 2014-02-20 8:03 PM, Facundo Curti wrote: > Fsacundo impolitely omitted attribution, so I have to add it back... > I said: >> That is such total FUD I just can't even say anything else about it >> without using some unsavory words. > You no need to be disrespectfull... How was my comment disrespectful? > It just was my opinion, and everybody are here to learn... But no one is going to learn (anything worthwhile) by spreading FUD. If you are going to voice a strong opinion, be prepared to have it challenged, especially when it is so clearly and obviously wrong. > Everybody say good points. I think it is just a matter of taste. Lol! Wrong. Making a claim that gentoo cannot be updated while maintaining its server operations is just so wrong it is ridiculous, and has nothing to do with 'taste'. If you don't want people to say that some claim you make is ridiculously false, stop making ridiculously false claims. Simple.