From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F9D1382C5 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57099E09DD; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com (mail-qt1-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 133CCE09C9 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id x12so4461200qts.9 for ; Sat, 16 May 2020 07:19:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=rtDV7udzVwQQifzMdtZrZgViXxp3CO6u7H/G6PW+c94=; b=h9oQYkm2cy8oXFzmIZppe/qafaDSpaHCztV350bFojKzO97VR2dUfn/cPYHxztFk4b yJ2ouOcMGAh3YynCi+skkky4bGfFBZNZvxa5h++bAJOKBnNlOm1hE6yaBnfbwT6XKaHd A4ywUubhyqyQ3FxjzHSdBHVHSOIV2XytcHJTZcEMbYPYfQI2+r5QxO3yuWyI5uujsVN3 fxIFgPZWInSEqoEBFQnHQ7oLME3RGyd7MH/5Ii4xg9/QOaCkmSO+bfzoEKcTmtGcjpj9 Phshs0gNfWbh9Ot7wBI4S8ayZNkRtoOUt9kAYweOyq5mkcntgKEovV5KBfn4CdjIFkJG ApAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QpylpJG3Mh5mu63Lc+4e3bG4aYw3sRVu71w3xqe++VJYYKW/z EGuJk1vT/mV2W4Pqi5F8vq+vdP6qjf0d2w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDp8BsrSi5r6bCf2TWU6ISnyTZMPTUU+C8C1FBQ7zjp+7VBVW+GtrFqNYeSkLv9B1Qq/AnZg== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3aa3:: with SMTP id o32mr8790436qte.364.1589638775999; Sat, 16 May 2020 07:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (c-76-23-130-96.hsd1.ct.comcast.net. [76.23.130.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z50sm4891576qta.18.2020.05.16.07.19.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 May 2020 07:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] no ebuilds for telegram To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <30425f04-1d8d-f436-fed7-001d9bacd434@web.de> <8efe54cf-9f52-db5b-8c2c-82175d5e98e1@gmail.com> <519ee87f-bb46-7dc5-bab6-a28eca6cf975@web.de> <7c037aa9-9c1f-eb2a-9be0-3e63ace5c730@web.de> <98d143be-c86a-df85-d45c-73f511a4bf38@web.de> From: Jack Message-ID: <52af2b71-1d8d-b39c-0e2b-d52636bf8501@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:19:33 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98d143be-c86a-df85-d45c-73f511a4bf38@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US-large X-Archives-Salt: d6bef179-571c-4f2a-bf9d-3c253dc4f938 X-Archives-Hash: 5a31c130cd08ed3fd04992dd459350b0 On 5/16/20 8:53 AM, n952162 wrote: > I did an emerge --sync and then "emerge -v1 portage" and it blew up all > over the place.  Log in the attachment. > > How can I get things reestablished?  Or, does gentoo simply require a > smarter user than me, and I should go back to ubuntu? I think the bottom line is that Gentoo needs to be updated more often than yearly.  Others may also comment, but right now, I think a reinstall might be easier than working through all the problems, unless you are trying to learn more about how things work. My first question is why you have portage-9999 unmasked?  I suggest going for the lowest version currently in the tree.  I'm not sure if your first step should really be portage itself, or upgrading packages where the installed version is now masked due to security errors or being too out of date. Jack > > > On 05/14/20 23:36, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 5:10 PM n952162 wrote: >>> On 05/14/20 22:46, Rich Freeman wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:13 PM n952162 wrote: >>>>> Action: sync for repo: gentoo, returned code = 0 >>>>> >>>>>     * An update to portage is available. It is _highly_ recommended >>>>>     * that you update portage now, before any other packages are >>>>> updated. >>>>> >>>>>     * To update portage, run 'emerge --oneshot portage' now. >>>> ...and?  Did you update portage as it was _highly_ recommended that >>>> you do so first?  What version of portage are you using? This appears >>>> on the top line of emerge --info. >>>> >>> $ emerge --info >>> Portage 2.3.49 (python 3.6.5-final-0, default/linux/x86/17.0, >>> gcc-7.3.0, >>> glibc-2.26-r7, 4.14.65-gentoo x86_64) >> That version of portage has been removed from the repo for over a year. >> >> I would update your system so that is current and then try again.  I >> believe that version of portage should still support EAPI 7 but there >> could be some other issue that is giving it problems with more recent >> packages in the tree. >> >