From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-153410-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBE8138A1F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3850E0EB8;
	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaabii.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.188])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD972E0BBB
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72C4208063
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:00:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h=
	message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=
	libertytrek.org; bh=D37lshKPPnUvRCnv7kVGEUuxCD4=; b=ILsfdf5LeAen
	PEl9yoInwmOQq6NeoE06dCwfu/tMolNc5sDf3HBev90maI8NzPlanGDatSGXsbHm
	kxRz/z6hP+XSzLEAQQHwPf5ElpYEqnO0zGKdWUtt7Xfx4kr768F4M2ynIm6MgbWf
	eBu4VIlnSK3tfZfUzGVtZlRlzavbToo=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org)
	by homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9ABF4208058
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E64A27.9090105@libertytrek.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:59:35 -0500
From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably
References: <lc36fi$ec7$1@ger.gmane.org> <20140126162426.7a6d1f30@falcon.eroen.eu> <52E54920.5010207@gmail.com> <52E54E34.7080709@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <52E54E34.7080709@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 190a7837-447b-479f-ad0c-774fd47bc351
X-Archives-Hash: 93c0a1572e068c9ed474e523063f58d4

On 2014-01-26 1:04 PM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
> So, not sure where your optimism comes from. But... some devs are
> interested in starting from scratch or picking up pkgcore (which would
> be the most sane thing to do IMO).

?

If the problem is really this potentially serious, why start from 
scratch, when Paludis is already very mature? Is it pure politics 
(someone just doesn't like Ciaran)?