From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-153380-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F46138A1F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 461BDE0D2B;
	Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:29:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2627EE0BAA
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id t10so1864611eei.35
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=8aJkFqBa6AlNHtRmsNqlckQKSk1JGd0sKVyAaZ5QgoM=;
        b=ux5FdZ/8qHi5WJhZtt6LpsnDg60KBucADEBOgCzJcUS1LQartPob1bXd8ESBM3u2OX
         FZy6goNCOmbIoL+4ZrZJvMPtMTMUQN2gjZlGgHV2Q3tBfKXUOhuyyRW2hspc7OTxzCBl
         XPmWGNvT4VDXRbTu3m+q5EHIMxxNpGRHUy8sFkHjBiadAhghKuAieD8rDym2e2pFlKdR
         Mhe643DetS3mmQgO39IHqpteWHjM0uXhogvvBJtNNQamLFgr04+tfEl89munz2o2ecE0
         2nGryhIvUtzkY18KBJY9bxPqKyiRTJeo5Xf+IyNAP+tI91Zer/Aw7ER9TzxkEwnLLHUc
         DRyA==
X-Received: by 10.15.68.129 with SMTP id w1mr21981422eex.26.1390764589896;
        Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p3E9E6608.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [62.158.102.8])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k41sm32640783eey.0.2014.01.26.11.29.48
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52E5622B.7040301@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:29:47 +0100
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably
References: <lc36fi$ec7$1@ger.gmane.org> <20140126162426.7a6d1f30@falcon.eroen.eu> <52E54920.5010207@gmail.com> <52E54E34.7080709@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <52E54E34.7080709@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 40485356-378c-4b4c-932b-9ee0b37350a7
X-Archives-Hash: 997533042db7ff796dc7931facaaebf3

Am 26.01.2014 19:04, schrieb hasufell:
> So, not sure where your optimism comes from. But... some devs are
> interested in starting from scratch or picking up pkgcore (which would
> be the most sane thing to do IMO).

please do. Please please pretty please.