From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6987138247 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 22:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26DE4E0AB7; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 22:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028F1E0931 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 22:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p61so7769152wes.31 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:42:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nLKtKynVZR9GvUB/bWTq3XbHWZbkogo65oAnQpXHJ2U=; b=m6HCLiQlQQnvQIbXTGMS4o4tmX9fsp8/N7KvFeBkouz56P12KktrCMY/QgeRB1bu2F M6BslqOYCX6Kf07SXrwP8Es09Ru6fEVVd/L/CuFBql7rcusZiBhmU2PNVd0NyNX8YZgP PMlyesUasYYN6JCYhTfWSJpMGj7K6QS20jDVlaeikKhr3mS6NDNJ2snZOiH7M8JksTuy Uc9LPXi31gRNNHX76UmrZoAu5wF7Ps45NhebbnOnz6B0KVracy71v0d+r55vNZdN1qDw 4hkDpLBCIGxZo6cIhDtIw0Y7RKvqvcsFp8aheDghksj2qexQ0TqBti5Kz0kTx9wNKvt0 tJuQ== X-Received: by 10.194.48.74 with SMTP id j10mr7022614wjn.41.1388097744682; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.20.0.41] (196-210-127-194.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.127.194]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jv5sm17930857wjc.1.2013.12.26.14.42.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:42:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52BCB0BE.8070401@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 00:42:06 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage References: <4980801.G2xPHJEpmf@zeus> In-Reply-To: <4980801.G2xPHJEpmf@zeus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0101b03c-09ba-4f8f-b38a-56a0102bd8d0 X-Archives-Hash: cc875f9b379cb741c305235f93e79c29 On 26/12/2013 21:13, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: > Hi there, > > How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? > I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes > occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. > > Memory leak? > > Versions involved: > dev-db/virtuoso-server-6.1.6 > kde-base/kde-meta-4.10.5 What column in htop shows that number? top, htop, and all their friends do not display what most people assume they display. Modern OSes (for more than a decade now) manage memory in a way that makes it impossible to answer "how much memory is this app using?" If you are looking at the VIRT column, just ignore it, that column is practically useless for most rational viewings of {h,}top -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com