From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E331381F3 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85CFBE0AD4; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a82.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ECAE0A7E for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a82.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a82.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F413328207B for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=IplAar85T0euMleh+OwLNlOQA/A=; b=JjuOqJl6Tm4R i9JntFWuW+YwP7SIbW0uB3Iz1jwvnRcJnIPP0s8mRl0q/9XpLzJQYyevXGUZZY/E W/cIiBN5avllNmRrBH9OHxwHzY+ozAMzCwzp31RQkQ99fRyFhUN09aCu36vuIOzm tP8opHDnuLWu0A48XUwpnfnDLasm/GI= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a82.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA50428205F for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52695F04.9010703@libertytrek.org> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:55:16 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing References: <5268E324.4030900@gmail.com> <5269070D.1000701@gmail.com> <20131024170340.GD25964@server> <52695AA5.7000700@libertytrek.org> <20131024175155.GF25964@server> In-Reply-To: <20131024175155.GF25964@server> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 07dd4c9f-dff6-48ae-924d-0f7197916dfa X-Archives-Hash: 5ddaccbb268998c1d36711e7589b1d86 On 2013-10-24 1:51 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:36:37PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >> >> Just because you got a phone that was bad, and didn't bother to get it >> replaced, doesn't make all Galaxy S4 phones as bad as yours. > > Hey, dipstick! Apparently you can't distinguish between S and S4. :-) Lol! You're right, but the basis of the argument stands...