From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-151799-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BCA1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:52:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9268AE0AAA;
	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:52:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yh0-f45.google.com (mail-yh0-f45.google.com [209.85.213.45])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62E5BE0A87
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:52:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yh0-f45.google.com with SMTP id i57so2075814yha.18
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type;
        bh=PahRYpx37MpjJbtFpS/2+Lom7nJd/bqiT2eK09SOgks=;
        b=jQeNys0SkSsr3Ch5BO0tLIZWr1qf6upQ9NTSKA+cNVy1MuNvyovw+vqen7KbRURJBM
         YWC+qDAamCmdFTSKP48Q1Ul2dC33jCGjNQItZAZ2AmtjRF3ARwtF+Rv0VdAzVFqfZoCG
         GA+/PnVp6EwTd5OPH9RIZYfer68ToX7bpZqFZEcZ5NST72n+6LxLhIGoTiei8QNTkhzx
         SEa9fkYix2FB8cIqPDAGsKKh/aYTbfuAaxnhPpRQQvtDJgxBEGWsrvyD6bJVhCxHaHlm
         QgUS3jv40qE497dJDnShM4jTuH5OAyD1txpHc28YBrSczQ6ilkRPoiYdawhwgDpmEfcg
         PJHQ==
X-Received: by 10.236.14.202 with SMTP id d50mr15035578yhd.47.1382439128426;
        Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-124-201.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.124.201])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s20sm34726822yhi.0.2013.10.22.03.52.07
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <526658D6.9090206@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 05:52:06 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New mobo change
References: <525CBB88.3070202@gmail.com>	<526448C6.2000501@gmail.com>	<52646297.4040604@gmail.com>	<52646CB4.5030400@gmail.com>	<5264831C.5090909@iinet.net.au>	<52649AE9.8040708@gmail.com>	<5264A199.1070604@iinet.net.au>	<5264A55D.5010508@gmail.com>	<20131021150701.GH2497@nukleus.Speedport_W723_V_Typ_A_1_00_098>	<52656844.2000602@gmail.com>	<20131022003506.22bb1af7@digimed.co.uk>	<5265BF61.4040500@gmail.com>	<20131022085019.5ee805b3@digimed.co.uk>	<52663F95.8060601@gmail.com> <20131022102048.7073b24c@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20131022102048.7073b24c@digimed.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030007050404030709050109"
X-Archives-Salt: ea838648-db6b-4d19-a751-18d2c6fc01f7
X-Archives-Hash: d656c5cc0286652ade428cc49db02a30

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030007050404030709050109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:04:21 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> Want to hear something equally funny?  I started the UPS service that
>> started this whole mess to see if it works.  This is from messages:
>
>> So, new mobo and $120 later, same freakin error.  All this, still in the
>> same hole.  Now ain't that something?  < Dale is going to the shop and
>> getting his mini sledge >
>
> Did you consider the possibility that the fault lies within the UPS?
>
>


Yep.  The UPS costs even more than the mobo tho.  ;-)  Still sucks tho. 
As it was, I don't have anything to test the UPS with.  I had to replace
something.

Oh well.  Live and learn.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!


--------------030007050404030709050109
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Neil Bothwick wrote:<br>
    <span style="white-space: pre;">&gt; On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:04:21
      -0500, Dale wrote:<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt;&gt; Want to hear something equally funny?&nbsp; I started the UPS
      service that<br>
      &gt;&gt; started this whole mess to see if it works.&nbsp; This is from
      messages:<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt;&gt; So, new mobo and $120 later, same freakin error.&nbsp; All
      this, still in the<br>
      &gt;&gt; same hole.&nbsp; Now ain't that something?&nbsp; &lt; Dale is going
      to the shop and<br>
      &gt;&gt; getting his mini sledge &gt;<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt; Did you consider the possibility that the fault lies within
      the UPS?<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt;</span><br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Yep.&nbsp; The UPS costs even more than the mobo tho.&nbsp; ;-)&nbsp; Still sucks
    tho.&nbsp; As it was, I don't have anything to test the UPS with.&nbsp; I had
    to replace something. <br>
    <br>
    Oh well.&nbsp; Live and learn. <br>
    <br>
    Dale<br>
    <br>
    :-)&nbsp; :-) <br>
    <br>
    -- <br>
    I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you
    understood or how you interpreted my words!<br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------030007050404030709050109--