From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4841381F3 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FE05E0B19; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63590E0AF2 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6876828405B for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:23:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=kL2I4OWBR4yBR2XjcxEep4o/G4k=; b=k1FxAnGE70JO fJJA4pq5XR+GXhqzlc2RWcEpX19O44SkE1NWs236XIgvsvZuXy48SkuHLlNC3fUm xHrzcxP6Xgz4/cXnIyWMcxYmWSodM+56i6QBPlnxmUwDvhhVq1cKcJihtuegraJI Y/NPTJ+0okHllNmZ9FcayDNzUbYNitY= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DFDF284058 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52610C22.1080106@libertytrek.org> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:23:30 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scripted iptables-restore References: <525AAADE.7040700@orlitzky.com> <525ACC38.8060008@orlitzky.com> <525C36BC.1060602@libertytrek.org> <525C57D6.7020408@gmail.com> <20131016232151.GA25241@waltdnes.org> <525F8AC3.2050504@gmail.com> <20131018023014.GA29789@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: <20131018023014.GA29789@waltdnes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4ce21fd3-7d77-43b3-8d63-2410e11f96b9 X-Archives-Hash: ce0a08fcd931572dc1ece2b38bfcb6d4 On 2013-10-17 10:30 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > I apologize. That is arguably a two factor system. When you said > "ssh key and password", I "jumped to delusions", assuming that it was a > standard ssh connection with the option of either key or password. Side question... So, wouldn't the simplest two-factor authentication be an SSH key that required a password?