From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBB91381F3 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0A12E09B4; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B3AFE096C for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 13:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.29.6] (vpn1.metro-data.com [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cyPW10Yjrz1hgC for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:53:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2; t=1381672397; bh=1cPkHKg8ILY0/APk36l844xsk3MChGnOBzBxVq+9T1Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fUecI1qhrv5t5pmDzLzrdOwY98lKJKbVUF9EIcAH6wN1NhF7n7hn3bKPOcKCcWeiH ja9fqzIn8fhBkjwwu+RRqDy3/Qwy8TX7P+61leNCusSbZ5TLhTRjRcOEbSVzoHdXEq ahTYNFkGvJlTH61qVPVgdyZyQofGuHeIKzMikdwg= Message-ID: <525AA5C9.8040506@orlitzky.com> Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:53:13 -0400 From: Michael Orlitzky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130929 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Where to put advanced routing configuration? References: <524DD388.9020507@fastmail.co.uk> <524F39F6.4040409@orlitzky.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 361a1210-53c6-416f-a772-4d77ad6abd48 X-Archives-Hash: 1d41446dc861deff3f78859350805ece On 10/13/2013 06:26 AM, shawn wilson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> >> 1. The iptables-restore syntax is uglier and harder to read. > > I don't get this - the syntax is *chain and then :tables (with > optional counters) instead of -N, and then a bunch of rules, and then > a COMMIT command (the only thing you don't get on the command line. > What am I missing or how is this uglier? > That's not the syntax, because there is no syntax, but let's forget that point anyway because it's subjective.