From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D78F1381F3 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FD63E0AD4; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3122BE0A98 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AC512129 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:24:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1380734643; bh=tKtYP+4vck82nVKuS6s8O3/5tOeI5WNp3lK9MPtgi4c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=T1x/i8jmLq2xRRfwxVPc/2G0vqiUfmOOGCoxzGdvY+a+Wq1q01YFa7dCfiMfzjAPn wVUGzGVX+04QyEWpRsiXQCdVepjyGf39fQ6iwRiII7MQ1qBu78g/RdTK81lnmZZuNN WEHRQELdVqK2ZX1tss7tEAovwY3x/jodmlrm5lXQ= Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 12919-02 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hiro.oops.intern (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:2cd9:17ba:1549:e177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 255C6123DF for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:24:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1380734642; bh=tKtYP+4vck82nVKuS6s8O3/5tOeI5WNp3lK9MPtgi4c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Wy0IFLGD0JWirXI5x9Fh0ZxkKstXZNjRSv7sQL3LxuGemeDHxdiumiQfk9HlKnHUx 5Pk2fhIpRT5XsCK2S0qhZybBKIBMvaymV4At/4OB9855Q1U/BnIq45sv9y/yBZJKgf BAae1+xn4VaPTNYFH3rdMf4gDKGbXSBbDyTCnutY= Message-ID: <524C56B1.2010505@xunil.at> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:24:01 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KVM on AMD ... why doesn't it just work? References: <524C113A.6070003@xunil.at> <524C25A2.5070000@fastmail.co.uk> <524C4A50.7050205@xunil.at> <524C4E19.1030802@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c X-Archives-Salt: dd67711e-c489-4892-8c64-0884d166e148 X-Archives-Hash: d9025d1c817bc6d1bbd68347c05e1a1b Am 02.10.2013 19:11, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: > the inverted sort by version will be: > > vmlinuz-blah > vmlinuz-3.10 > vmlinuz-3.9 > vmlinuz-3.8 > > and the kernel with an alphanumeric "version" will be always be the default. Exactly what I saw, yes. No complaints ... ok with me, I should have checked my grub.conf as well (and did in the end). >> kerninst found that one and always set that one as default so my various >> recompilings never changed the kernel itself but only the modules ... >> which lead to strange mismatches ... > > That should explain everything. > As I said before, kerninst was not written to test configurations; is > for when you have nailed the configuration and want to automatize the > kernel update. Yep. I just want to settle on one method to generate the kernel(s) even on that customer server. Right now I am still tuning and toggling around ;-) S