From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC84F1381F3 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75E28E0BCE; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postler.lichtfels.com (postler.lichtfels.com [78.46.92.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690DDE0AAD for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF6312130 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:45:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1380717946; bh=lt6J6pJi+NMVExouvNOjeDz2CbRJONFJrti6d2k7vKw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=qeCkDweA8faRzGjZrQNh7/SmG46xJk/mDE89AATsnh/LtkfDnbpZaM9qJfyh1HJ2Y NvFOo/yC8ig3m/GdiR0z5BpTSvBbbWWdQwsA4Y6kmhzKjjxR4p/fV6FArbCFfABiUX gU1W+biRKNsBvZjXZ+uH9LwNOKPBa+gk9BncacOo= Received: from postler.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postler.lichtfels.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 24997-10 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:45:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hiro.oops.intern (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:2cd9:17ba:1549:e177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postler.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88D86123DF for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:45:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1380717944; bh=lt6J6pJi+NMVExouvNOjeDz2CbRJONFJrti6d2k7vKw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=0+4WGLNWkmfRhw4brqTKmV4F+cIsc13NXNNXzWkRP12CvshfHlWNqaDr4JQ8GWtqx GExWg8jSOd5m8pUJLmgoiZKGQrh3G7zUN6HdnWPt0esYcLowyWiLG76Xq60ixkL7q5 WYJRDK0ktnQaB13SrWyPnjN8dveGFEcThMAvUc4E= Message-ID: <524C1577.4050801@xunil.at> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:45:43 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] KVM on AMD ... why doesn't it just work? References: <524C113A.6070003@xunil.at> <524C13B2.2030108@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: <524C13B2.2030108@xunil.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2c X-Archives-Salt: d3fd278a-0879-4a0e-a37c-9e6bebc89ee4 X-Archives-Hash: 27546d21f538e05b764b32ec804dc3fe Am 02.10.2013 14:38, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Am 02.10.2013 14:27, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > >> In general I am rather disappointed by the performance of this server. I >> expected way more *bang* for the bucks ... And our new and ambitious friend also comes along ;-) systemd-tmpfiles ... hogs CPU ... stopped it now ... and will look for details in the evening. Now the load is lower and compiling the modules is much faster. Maybe this even solves the network-issue!? Still the "Unknown symbol" for kvm_amd ...