From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EG3Qa-0003b4-Qk
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:46:05 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8FNe9e2018485;
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:40:09 GMT
Received: from qproxy.gmail.com (qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.200])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8FNZMeg016414
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:35:23 GMT
Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q11so38440qbq
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=uBCj/e0pcTOxMw7S2K0Y3tgcSCAkr+WBwHaUWRqP3j61CEIJ4dwdwiv5KwgkS26aPhoRM/whS0NPBInoFjPzTMND9Nzmt2kTrCyiNWGtThCVpOawJu5QIje41E86bZH9PgAguBLm7PyaS2SrVDll0BqhFehwcbWC/oZPMGaf5kk=
Received: by 10.65.138.4 with SMTP id q4mr1538qbn;
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.103.12 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5248cd5005091516405bdb9653@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:40:21 -0400
From: - - <cornmander@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] hardware advice for dual-processor set-up on gentoo
In-Reply-To: <5248cd50050915162712f20d99@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_6423_2661151.1126827621795"
References: <d9a0a6da050912134040cde233@mail.gmail.com>
<20050912200733.3da4cc99@chi.speakeasy.net>
<5248cd50050915162712f20d99@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: d7653321-93bc-4ab0-b500-252996ae695a
X-Archives-Hash: 62161211b3a5364d64f610eb010bc0a4
------=_Part_6423_2661151.1126827621795
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
After a google search, it seems like the ICC compiler compiles faster and=
=20
runs certain programs better. Gentoo has a package, can anyone say if the=
=20
ICC compiler has any issues compiling common packages such as the gentoo=20
base packages, gnome, or kde?
------=_Part_6423_2661151.1126827621795
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
After a google search, it seems like the ICC compiler compiles faster
and runs certain programs better. Gentoo has a package, can anyone say
if the ICC compiler has any issues compiling common packages such as
the gentoo base packages, gnome, or kde?<br><br><br>
------=_Part_6423_2661151.1126827621795--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list