From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96E51381F3 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 02:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E060E0F3B; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 02:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mahal.bihira.com (mahal.bihira.com [67.159.5.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49DBBE0E6F for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 02:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 118.70-40-235.netnet.net ([70.40.235.118]:44173 helo=[192.168.1.144]) by mahal.bihira.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VQSnU-0007bw-QN for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 02:01:17 +0000 Message-ID: <5248DB6D.50903@sporkbox.us> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:01:17 -0500 From: Daniel Campbell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130921 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd installation location References: <20130929195206.GA16744@linux1> <5248CBB9.5010205@sporkbox.us> <5248D265.4080908@sporkbox.us> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mahal.bihira.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sporkbox.us X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: mahal.bihira.com: authenticated_id: lists@sporkbox.us X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: b342190f-c29b-4136-bd47-109b392fe4de X-Archives-Hash: 28eb028daf1350f15607e1aa73b9c599 On 09/29/2013 08:51 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> It's fairly obvious (to me, anyway) that anything mounting a filesystem >> and making it available is system-critical. I run samba and don't need >> it for boot, but like you said, someone may need that. I wouldn't see a >> problem with smbmount being in /bin. FUSE deserves similar treatment. >> LVM's another that probably deserves special treatment. >> > > If you allow FUSE you've already failed, because arbitrary programs can > be required by FUSE filesystems. Suddenly your ssh client should be pushed > to /, or your telnet, or rsync, or ftp. > FUSE is that lenient with what it can use to mount with? o_O