From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-151081-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FC21381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:21:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CE98E0F0D;
	Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:21:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A605E0EEA
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:21:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id m15so4753023wgh.19
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=w369XwTNc338U1N1ufJTeCQsnTOYXPxg5Fg/OHiqN2w=;
        b=nqgraA7lszhRXzwEi5/4S92btDzxwXI5RsGHtJNHyJS2ogUY4WTkT/VuUfFjquZXK2
         AP9Z0Z3LBAIr+Drf9lzhcFB3ry1MBKFik8r3nF2GKeCPlE1l5bfqSfTWExbQLCzx70N5
         +WPWz0Un/YlDV4qBkOSN8YELloXs38xUKD3vEleBwPZp+4/L1tmuaxgh5nq7BEjSlpgR
         o+PV6bFpxiah4Jkr3Tp9OHfTVAhV06iRsLRHiUMseMncPLuFCEbuCCIhGQEDGd4uYAbU
         kgpRPl+whlt+r06Kmc7RIXkScLdpFYYjutH/TBOP4ixkrvIupikXD9sINWfK4+YwVrmt
         t2wQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.185.97 with SMTP id fb1mr10870324wic.61.1380482465733;
        Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.0.40] (196-210-102-121.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.102.121])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dl10sm6181315wib.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52487C92.1020407@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:16:34 +0200
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
References: <5246079E.7090406@gmail.com> <524761B4.60805@gmail.com> <20130929052937.GA30380@waltdnes.org> <201309290925.06893.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <5247E4C2.5040502@gmail.com> <52480720.7070704@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52480720.7070704@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 3649ef12-5e0c-4c63-a032-49bed7454969
X-Archives-Hash: 162dd8248c55d9fb530773d0e4798584

On 29/09/2013 12:55, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 29.09.2013 10:28, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>> On 29/09/2013 10:25, Mick wrote:
>>> On Sunday 29 Sep 2013 06:29:37 Walter Dnes wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 06:09:40PM -0500, Dale wrote
>>>>
>>>>> Most likely, I'll install Kubuntu to start.  Then I may roam around
>>>>> and test other distros until I find one I like.  Thing is, I already
>>>>> have a starting point.
>>>>   I'm already looking. http://forums.funtoo.org/viewtopic.php?id=2265
>>>> and they also dislike systemd.  I think I could get to like it.  See
>>>> also http://bugs.funtoo.org/browse/FL-34
>>> Very interesting!  This looks as a logical way to put udev back in its 
>>> userspace box and stop it breaking the OS, or did I understand it incorrectly?
>>>
>> Exherbo might be worth a look too[1].
>>
>> It's a sort-of Gentoo fork using the portage tree and PMS; plus Ciaran
>> strikes me as the kind of guy who *would* expend massive effort to find
>> a way round current udev and systemd.
>>
>>
>> [1] I didn't look myself. I have no idea what Exherbo's stance is on
>> this matter.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> why do you bring up udev and systemd AT ALL?
> 
> They are not the problem or the reason why seperate /usr is prone to break.


I fell victim to the sheer amount of fud around systemd and udev and
typed without thinking enough.

s/current udev and systemd/the root cause/g


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com