From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922C91381F3 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8E32E0F4A; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1E4E0F45 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BD4AE05B for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=P1Esnb5PlbsG9ashT+uK7HFuLcs=; b=AQIAEVOJH/jV 1tJ/Lg298mokP8Tc+WtfS0NEk3KHzTEmRd74mCsgy4cHRMiSw9mnaZ9DC7XSJ1nY nHVyeVHkz0c/sS6mY2ZGEWjEz5mfqqJVFui5WqaYLttR8nIjRXjSrmCh08gpgplc JehXrovcC5jog1/edXQxrlEmqPphkMM= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71FFBAE059 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5248697B.40405@libertytrek.org> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:55:07 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 References: <20130927222109.GD23408@server> <5246079E.7090406@gmail.com> <20130927223916.GE23408@server> <52460D42.2080109@gmail.com> <20130928003220.GF23408@server> <20130928160159.GA4247@linux1> <20130928190441.GB11317@acm.acm> <20130928211702.46eda062@digimed.co.uk> <20130928210938.GD11317@acm.acm> <20130928233750.55b2683a@digimed.co.uk> <20130929120743.GC3161@acm.acm> In-Reply-To: <20130929120743.GC3161@acm.acm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3bd11e74-edfe-4d28-b1f8-ead36bfd42e9 X-Archives-Hash: ebf59ed62b604b8f62d9b2c7b960952b On 2013-09-29 8:07 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Please be aware the change I was talking about was the decision to break > separate /usr, not the Gentoo devs' reaction to this breakage. Why did > we only become aware of the decision to break separate /usr after it was > too late to do anything about it? How could such a thing happen, if not > through conspiracy? Even if this quote: 'nothing in politics happens by accident'? never really was spoken, it should have - because truer words were never spoken.