From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669EA1381F3 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6580E0E84; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.alltele.net (smtp.alltele.net [85.30.0.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E5D4E0BE3 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([87.227.57.71]) by smtp.alltele.net (IceWarp 10.4.5) with ESMTP id 201309291905031671 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:05:03 +0200 Message-ID: <52485DBF.1020906@coolmail.se> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:05:03 +0200 From: pk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130921 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 References: <20130927222109.GD23408@server> <5246079E.7090406@gmail.com> <524759FB.2090304@gmail.com> <524764E1.9030509@googlemail.com> <524766E4.1020802@coolmail.se> <5248081E.9040405@googlemail.com> <5248462F.3060601@coolmail.se> <52485138.7010007@googlemail.com> <5248571B.1020803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5248571B.1020803@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.73 required=5.10 tests=LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=0.73 version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (1.1) on smtp.alltele.net X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A0B0202.52485DC0.0093,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-Archives-Salt: cf2fb863-c9b8-4179-9a47-ef51be389922 X-Archives-Hash: fc5d023f3920b9383ac29a5974fd7946 On 2013-09-29 18:36, Dale wrote: > That could be the problem then couldn't it? Indeed. :-) Best regards Peter K