From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C101381F3 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 776A4E0DD1; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com (mail-bk0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52632E0DA4 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id na10so1582698bkb.14 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:55:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b6sLW8XPYAqaiupC1N8uFQA6uU4RTctAzx2N1FPFwiw=; b=swiQaNRqrF1OwtuI/KnwGukhMnmZ8yLz3tfg7ul+JoeiuzV1wq4Y5GSrSD2ZabBJrb d4AeDBltSzo4OhKBKJFDK4yLrk2n88gnS5+xLbbb5Z8niXWXBZHDvST+GMfi10dojnU9 Rlb5omhPhWRxIOnpHM0dtxlgUZw0IopzcD6+fhljfFQIi8b6IGmMOZaUk8O9YmDqXFh3 J8LbFQGQcNcnuoS4NGrai8wmlHvhNey6hUEHrhHi/FZKbdfSBzBwndI1EoEMSc4JjCdD XDOq32mkKr0NVKOvesZ4WGRIy3Jjwa2EDu++hmAeiC/gM8WIXewEoDPKrt2tybRcz01q nRoA== X-Received: by 10.205.14.197 with SMTP id pr5mr14198080bkb.6.1380452129769; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p3E9E68D2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [62.158.104.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nv4sm9133485bkb.3.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52480720.7070704@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:55:28 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 References: <5246079E.7090406@gmail.com> <524761B4.60805@gmail.com> <20130929052937.GA30380@waltdnes.org> <201309290925.06893.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <5247E4C2.5040502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5247E4C2.5040502@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c140466f-479d-444b-84eb-bac56e7ebd43 X-Archives-Hash: 6ee51a4e5815a34aa4ef72f9febe000e Am 29.09.2013 10:28, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On 29/09/2013 10:25, Mick wrote: >> On Sunday 29 Sep 2013 06:29:37 Walter Dnes wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 06:09:40PM -0500, Dale wrote >>> >>>> Most likely, I'll install Kubuntu to start. Then I may roam around >>>> and test other distros until I find one I like. Thing is, I already >>>> have a starting point. >>> I'm already looking. http://forums.funtoo.org/viewtopic.php?id=2265 >>> and they also dislike systemd. I think I could get to like it. See >>> also http://bugs.funtoo.org/browse/FL-34 >> Very interesting! This looks as a logical way to put udev back in its >> userspace box and stop it breaking the OS, or did I understand it incorrectly? >> > Exherbo might be worth a look too[1]. > > It's a sort-of Gentoo fork using the portage tree and PMS; plus Ciaran > strikes me as the kind of guy who *would* expend massive effort to find > a way round current udev and systemd. > > > [1] I didn't look myself. I have no idea what Exherbo's stance is on > this matter. > > > why do you bring up udev and systemd AT ALL? They are not the problem or the reason why seperate /usr is prone to break.