From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150997-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A941381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 22:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC34E0D35;
	Sat, 28 Sep 2013 22:15:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F741E0CB9
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 22:15:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n2so3009361oag.39
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type;
        bh=XtMBloHehcuQX7dw9ulD4iRnu9lQZ7tt+9AKA9xA3P4=;
        b=JVLxjZE9XEUYmfyULDGAZAM8iPpSthQEPvM0bYG2SqWLSddmIsBWV+MkxIdU1l+O/x
         pi502Eaux+cfIH9r2/Cfbgz/FVUDSJqZq54mmthRPXEo9GTXPgFge2+Tk0Q/ovlxF/e4
         3ByWS/AyspBxZ0+OuiA29fo5LL/uAzpsqumeaIQWtp/rDADHDEwkSF2NzRfIPKgvAtLz
         eNZtCqllQwCjfUG+vePnTOL8PRHwacx0/E3LC7uMYHj7zyCBptF5LIcLVATol7wewbBj
         m9tEwZ5V6vqlzQs8ALl7Z3fQrIYBhdz9pcsEy4EuTWJm/xpmsl5cEQyP1+6PRDWtvWbG
         /eKg==
X-Received: by 10.60.63.116 with SMTP id f20mr12436850oes.29.1380406542957;
        Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-149-129.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.149.129])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rr6sm25510801oeb.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5247550D.5010200@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 17:15:41 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
References: <20130927222109.GD23408@server>	<5246079E.7090406@gmail.com>	<20130927223916.GE23408@server>	<52460D42.2080109@gmail.com>	<20130928003220.GF23408@server>	<20130928160159.GA4247@linux1>	<5247128D.3030801@gmail.com> <20130928205308.547335bf@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20130928205308.547335bf@digimed.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------090902000804020209040809"
X-Archives-Salt: 94428dc2-534b-490f-81fc-b3729631038c
X-Archives-Hash: 3754f345c736633589a34e3840cf45a4

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090902000804020209040809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 12:31:57 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> One thing that you seem to be missing here.  Before Gentoo, I used
>> Mandrake.  It had a init thingy.  It caused me much grief and is one
>> reason I left Mandrake.  I also didn't like the upgrade process either
>> but one reason I chose Gentoo is no init thingy.  I wanted to be rid of
>> that.  Now, whether it is udev or not, here comes that stupid init
>> thingy just because someone doesn't want to put files where they should
>> be which is not inside /usr.
>
> Mandrake used an initrd, not the same as an initramfs, which is directly
> supported by the kernel.
> 

Whichever.  Same shoes, different color is all.

>
>> So, given my history with the init thingy, if I do use a init thingy and
>> it fails for whatever reason, I'll be installing something else.
>
> Good luck trying to find something else that doesn't use an init*.
>
>

Thing is, those others are a LOT faster to install.  Heck, I got
Mandrake down to like 30 minutes from booting CD to booting off the hard
drive and logging in and that was a COMPLETE install too.  I installed
Kubuntu for my brother and while not Gentoo, he doesn't have issues. 
Kubuntu takes care of the init thingy, NOT ME.  If it did break,
reinstall and go back to surfing.  It fails on Gentoo, I'm stuck.  I'm
installing something and it won't be spending a good day to two days
installing Gentoo.

It seems folks think I just don't like new stuff.  I don't mind new
stuff.  I use new stuff quite often.  I just don't like using stuff that
breaks, switching to something else to get away from it, then turn right
around and have the same broken junk thrown back at me.  One downside
for Gentoo in that case, the install takes tiime and effort.  It's not
point and click.  I love Gentoo but I'm not in love with installing on a
regular basis whenever something breaks and I can't fix it or get booted
to where I can at least try to find out HOW to fix it.  That is the key
problem.  If I can't boot, I can't google or post here or anywhere
else.  I know how to fix that tho.  I'm sure I can find something that
will boot in somewhat short order.  Question is, what will it be?

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!


--------------090902000804020209040809
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Neil Bothwick wrote:<br>
    <span style="white-space: pre;">&gt; On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 12:31:57
      -0500, Dale wrote:<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt;&gt; One thing that you seem to be missing here.&nbsp; Before
      Gentoo, I used<br>
      &gt;&gt; Mandrake.&nbsp; It had a init thingy.&nbsp; It caused me much grief
      and is one<br>
      &gt;&gt; reason I left Mandrake.&nbsp; I also didn't like the upgrade
      process either<br>
      &gt;&gt; but one reason I chose Gentoo is no init thingy.&nbsp; I
      wanted to be rid of<br>
      &gt;&gt; that.&nbsp; Now, whether it is udev or not, here comes that
      stupid init<br>
      &gt;&gt; thingy just because someone doesn't want to put files
      where they should<br>
      &gt;&gt; be which is not inside /usr.<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt; Mandrake used an initrd, not the same as an initramfs, which
      is directly<br>
      &gt; supported by the kernel.<br>
      &gt;&nbsp; </span><br>
    <br>
    Whichever.&nbsp; Same shoes, different color is all. <br>
    <br>
    <span style="white-space: pre;">&gt;<br>
      &gt;&gt; So, given my history with the init thingy, if I do use a
      init thingy and<br>
      &gt;&gt; it fails for whatever reason, I'll be installing
      something else.<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt; Good luck trying to find something else that doesn't use an
      init*.<br>
      &gt;<br>
      &gt;</span><br>
    <br>
    Thing is, those others are a LOT faster to install.&nbsp; Heck, I got
    Mandrake down to like 30 minutes from booting CD to booting off the
    hard drive and logging in and that was a COMPLETE install too.&nbsp; I
    installed Kubuntu for my brother and while not Gentoo, he doesn't
    have issues.&nbsp; Kubuntu takes care of the init thingy, NOT ME.&nbsp; If it
    did break, reinstall and go back to surfing.&nbsp; It fails on Gentoo,
    I'm stuck.&nbsp; I'm installing something and it won't be spending a good
    day to two days installing Gentoo. <br>
    <br>
    It seems folks think I just don't like new stuff.&nbsp; I don't mind new
    stuff.&nbsp; I use new stuff quite often.&nbsp; I just don't like using stuff
    that breaks, switching to something else to get away from it, then
    turn right around and have the same broken junk thrown back at me.&nbsp;
    One downside for Gentoo in that case, the install takes tiime and
    effort.&nbsp; It's not point and click.&nbsp; I love Gentoo but I'm not in
    love with installing on a regular basis whenever something breaks
    and I can't fix it or get booted to where I can at least try to find
    out HOW to fix it.&nbsp; That is the key problem.&nbsp; If I can't boot, I
    can't google or post here or anywhere else.&nbsp; I know how to fix that
    tho.&nbsp; I'm sure I can find something that will boot in somewhat short
    order.&nbsp; Question is, what will it be?<br>
    <br>
    Dale<br>
    <br>
    :-)&nbsp; :-) <br>
    <br>
    -- <br>
    I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you
    understood or how you interpreted my words!<br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------090902000804020209040809--