From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2856C1381F3 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E775CE0E93; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33B5E0E50 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m6so2527867oag.21 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:57:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IiF3g/zadBXnr9helf4rVW7px/QJoIhpVqevVRyqfWI=; b=L8Hg4DSu6TZcssq2LE7GmmSxYCxBH5exEkMi7wBRQZZ4tudBN5iVqaDphy1X/yrGbH U5VWiyx6hxy+56crAnPxHbG2RuhjSQN2Y24TVM6W8hjxZErB6jyubdu89zvsoOQ7wsKG S+pPxNlDW4VpYrhYNtdDXpgvSouNC+YF+1Q1kw8QnGvJB5omDrvTr6evD5RdWoL1b/Lo A+txRrfKroxHJBGBYOFO6BIoDce5ta6GuohWpf7u7nm+3Tt9KrEOqLLdZ1IZYYHhMshb V3u+YnBSJTW7rT/C2tjJoDESwQG0nN3qkgn8R7Qxf5s9CA2WKja+hp/RmuORgU+qNPW1 XDGw== X-Received: by 10.182.227.136 with SMTP id sa8mr7826552obc.39.1380322627832; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-149-129.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.149.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id it7sm13743298obb.11.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52460D42.2080109@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:57:06 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 References: <20130927222109.GD23408@server> <5246079E.7090406@gmail.com> <20130927223916.GE23408@server> In-Reply-To: <20130927223916.GE23408@server> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4aece9f6-59e4-4e1a-8271-2f6a6c79d74d X-Archives-Hash: a0b16851d846d3b9113f3d0d6ccdff4d Bruce Hill wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote: >> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this. >> If I do, this could get interesting, again. Dale > Do you have /usr separate from / ? Yep. From my understanding tho, eudev is not supposed to be affected by this problem tho. One reason for this being seperate, I have / and /boot on a regular partition and everything else on LVM. Sometimes that /usr gets a bit full. It's not so bad after I moved all the portage stuff out and put it in /var. Now I have to watch /var too. lol Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!