From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989BF1381F3 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CA63E0AFC; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA9A6E0A59 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l18so4532649wgh.2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:38:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zdq7TXqTjYHLBm8qI5CupNJgpruVqKXfMPk1CUq8zQE=; b=yLsGIM0aaURaJnpw97HZ4WVJLhHnnff4x9fQCCpOn9m241hgv9g3zRgivT5HG/p3Cr d3OwUXjdoZIF00r2ns0d5fpyH3w0lbxtRQOmbQhmyeMOtgFMx35269CWEpuqVqn5GKZ5 7OHpMPLHEtMGfjvBuHnBHBVtHClDl16mh+Z4LPE+rtOPKXR8VZsn5QrIa6hyRf/wEtme dUaLvjMyDwm0KPpYFu81Q3zU0umdEIYPdic7ckDBMyOAavkIceFiFyU9ZV6JKJbUOQqf Z4ay6dJ8oAncvIxsHmSEsmaLZwWMmkbThMKpmOlzfMHYWzek5fv5jO/MC1XJKnKKYE7Y Msbg== X-Received: by 10.194.242.200 with SMTP id ws8mr335933wjc.60.1380098291438; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.20.202] (dustpuppy.is.co.za. [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ed12sm15383197wic.11.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52429FEB.8030806@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:33:47 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130919 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problems building www-client/uzbl-9999 References: <20130925073307.GA25548@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: <20130925073307.GA25548@waltdnes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e51cd7d7-9476-4818-b0b6-e65f73615fa9 X-Archives-Hash: d63ed3ef2148b983f63e6d1b4d11054b On 25/09/2013 09:33, Walter Dnes wrote: > Since this is a 9999 ebuild, I'm not filing a bugzilla bug. Note that > www-client/uxbl-2012.05.14 built OK. Apparently, the latest git sources > have some features I really want, that are not in any of the other > ebuilds. So I'm trying to build it. The 9999 build first pulled down > and installed git, so that it could then pull the latest uzbl source. > The compile seems to have gone OK, but the final install process ran > into permission problems creating a directory. Here's the part with the > error... > >> running build_scripts >> running install_lib >> creating /usr/lib64/python3.2/site-packages/uzbl >> * ACCESS DENIED: mkdir: /usr/lib64/python3.2/site-packages/uzbl >> error: could not create '/usr/lib64/python3.2/site-packages/uzbl': Permission denied >> make: *** [install-event-manager] Error 1 >> * ERROR: www-client/uzbl-9999 failed (install phase): >> * emake failed > > I'm attaching the full log. The system is a Dell Intel i5, with > pure 64-bit mode (no multilib), and the basic workstation profile, cut > down even more by starting USE with "-*" and adding the flags I need for > a "custom profile". > > This is the first time I've tried a "9999" ebuild, so I may be missing > something obvious. /usr/lib64/python3.2/site-packages/ is user:group > root:root > That looks like a horrible bug in the ebuild - it's trying to install to the live filesystem. ebuilds install to the work directory in /var/tmp/portage/ and the merge phase moves the files over to /usr. You can either file a bug at b.g.o. or contact the ebuild maintainer directly. I don't see that a -9999 ebuild makes any difference, once the code has been checked out and a working copy made, the ebuild works like any other ebuild - no special magic -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com