From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DBF1381F3 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC1B6E0AB8; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ramses-pyramidenbau.de (ramses-pyramidenbau.de [78.47.114.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F8BE0A5C for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.21] (95-91-233-77-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.233.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ramses-pyramidenbau.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89ECE63FC3 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:13:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5239B502.7040706@ramses-pyramidenbau.de> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:13:22 +0200 From: Ralf Ramsauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130913 Thunderbird/17.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] which filesystem is more suitable for /var/tmp/portage? References: <5239A20E.7090102@ramses-pyramidenbau.de> <4083700.7YOtJyrB1G@wstn> In-Reply-To: <4083700.7YOtJyrB1G@wstn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 30021875-f483-4c07-9896-6fe188bdb3c5 X-Archives-Hash: e753e62323b6ba160488132e798e349b On 09/18/13 16:05, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 14:52:30 Ralf Ramsauer wrote: > >> In my opinion, reiser is a bit outdated ... > What is the significance of its date? I use reiserfs on my Atom box for /var, > /var/cache/squid and /usr/portage, and on my workstation for /usr/portage and > /home/prh/.VirtualBox. It's never given me any trouble at all. Outdated doesn't generally imply trouble. > > Perhaps you meant that, say, ext4 has better all-round performance? Ok, let's call it better all-round performance :-) Regards, -- Ralf