From: "Yuri K. Shatroff" <yks-uno@yandex.ru>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE: unwanted dependencies
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:04:09 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52331B59.1000802@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l0v572$n7b$1@ger.gmane.org>
On 13.09.2013 17:50, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 13/09/2013 21:35, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
>> On 13.09.2013 14:14, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 13/09/2013 12:10, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
>>>> Hi people,
>>>>
>>>> I am about to update KDE from 4.10.4 to 4.11.1.
>>>> Is it possible to avoid installing various nepomuks and akonadis which
>>>
>>> No
>>
>> Pity.
>>
>>>> appear to be required now? I have set USE=-semantic-desktop but it
>>>> doesn't seem to help.
> While the USE flag has disappeared, you could try putting nepomuk and
> akonadi into your package.provided file.
>
>>>> My current KDE installation is quite happy without that stuff (which
>>>> also brings along tons of other crap).
>>>
>>>
>>> The KDE maintainers posted quite extensively about this some time back.
>>
>> Some time back I heard that KDE devs were striving to make KDE more
>> modular.
> KDE upstream is, yes, and how this will affect semantic-desktop remains
> to be seen.
so there is hope? ;)
>>> It is too hard to try and extract semantic-desktop out of the KDE build
>>> whilst not breaking everything else. What you now do is allow the stuff
>>> to be built, and disable the function in System Settings.
>>
>> Well why wasn't it too hard before? It's not quite obvious why one's got
>> to "extract" some additional functionality, as opposed to including it
>> when needed. A strange approach, all in all.
> The decision to remove the USE flag happened mostly because it maintain,
> and was in general not well supported anyway.
>
> There have been a number of proposals about the situation: do nothing,
> do a full revert, or implement some compromise. I would hope that we
> make a final decision about this before stabilising any 4.11 version.
Clear, then I'll opt to wait for the stable 4.11.
>> BTW, it seems that mysql is also a hard dependency for QT now. At least,
>> the average joe can't be scorned any more for not having a "server". Hey
>> to all localhost admins! :)
> That shouldn't be the case. The default akonadi backend is mysql, why
> could explain why it's being pulled in.
Yes, really, I was mislead, it is qtsql which requires setting the mysql
flag, but I missed that it was due to akonadi.
Thank you for the detailed answer, Michael.
--
Best wishes,
Yuri K. Shatroff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-13 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 10:10 [gentoo-user] KDE: unwanted dependencies Yuri K. Shatroff
2013-09-13 10:14 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-13 11:35 ` Yuri K. Shatroff
2013-09-13 13:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Palimaka
2013-09-13 14:04 ` Yuri K. Shatroff [this message]
2013-09-13 15:57 ` Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2013-09-14 12:39 ` Mick
2013-09-13 15:04 ` [gentoo-user] " Paul Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52331B59.1000802@yandex.ru \
--to=yks-uno@yandex.ru \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox