From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150571-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4B71381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61F81E0CAF;
	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:14:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D72E0CA9
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:14:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BD77D8060
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 04:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h=
	message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=
	libertytrek.org; bh=RQm4l+OPdTr+IKTsoDTsxaA4x2I=; b=OX5z5lr65FbU
	aMgQJhGCP5PbYf2UpRD7+OlOJGXTyOwiXFskFjHf9FnrBD44wLneYWfIScmzWfyl
	K50xiKJOmw4lQ9owy7iSWVapbnNf/DLPKOPPsndE2IpyyMbTI5gDCOSrrmSwE4I/
	NK1ZZdMSNwtdDdqrN34gZD0g5qeCAlI=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org)
	by homiemail-a58.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC1C57D8058
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 04:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52305096.7090002@libertytrek.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:14:30 -0400
From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?
References: <522DD0A1.5010207@libertytrek.org> <2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn> <522F0E03.1070402@gmail.com> <1823961.b6Gd6v5fYI@wstn>
In-Reply-To: <1823961.b6Gd6v5fYI@wstn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 748754eb-c78a-416a-808d-627b72f8b752
X-Archives-Hash: c9661e04c2539fedf65007da3f54ea71

On 2013-09-10 10:13 AM, Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote:
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> Is it working for you, Dale? :-)
>> So far, so good.  I been using unstable, except for the 9999 version,
>> for quite a while.  Are you saying something is broke and it works for
>> me??  O_O  Seriously??  This is a joke right??
>
> No joke, I assure you. As Markos pointed out, a bug has already been opened,
> and I fell over it with a vanilla make.conf.
>
> Unless someone knows of a work-around, I'll stick with the old version of
> portage until the bug-fix reaches the stable system.

Well, according to that bug, the fix is IN 2.2.1 (well, it says the fix 
is in 2.1.13 and 2.2.0_alpha189, which means it is (should be?) in 2.2.1...

So it can't be this bug?