From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P3maU-0007O1-Ca for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:16:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90883E087B; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A033E087B for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:15:59 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,296,1283727600"; d="scan'208";a="221830486" Received: from 213-152-39-90.dsl.eclipse.net.uk (HELO compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org) ([213.152.39.90]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2010 10:15:59 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [192.168.1.101]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6C96C4D2 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:15:57 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] seq24 fails to comoile From: Stroller In-Reply-To: <20101007054005.GA20206@solfire> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:15:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <52213392-0D02-4670-A895-BB16974BC35C@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <20101007024354.GA5624@solfire> <20101007052740.GB17511@waltdnes.org> <20101007054005.GA20206@solfire> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Archives-Salt: 3f809065-92f0-4fbc-8381-2d8bc112fe23 X-Archives-Hash: 242bcb0507f535e382b5b6fd94c847e9 On 7 Oct 2010, at 06:40, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: >> ... >>> MAKEOPTS="-j 12" >> >> Arrrrrrrrgh Nooooooooo!!! That's probably your problem right there. >> The recommendation in the manual is N+1, where N == number of cores. Do >> you have 11 or more cores? I find that even that isn't always safe. I >> set... >> >> MAKEOPTS="-j 1" >> ... > > I made the changes you suggested and now got an different error ... it > still does not compile. Did you reduce it to (the number of cores in your system + 1) or to "-j 1"? If the former, try the latter. Stroller.