From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4ED1381F3 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83F8EE10D0; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6943CE10D2 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FA420806D for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=u0TwoUUtGC5vsfw1YZo/SEWEaG8=; b=UTer45v70+O6 uDq9hf6o5pxMJuF8izE946w28SKIX3TqmMt1dHPL1TKVlAgR5oGcGy2rI+weyGyu QSTnau/7lRlP1ZSavDEwuAzP2TV5EgbHvttN155gwYcEsEA5xU85WT2S59PfA/PC V5WHylY9sSMcNPZodSTBivawNYX7wR4= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7C05208063 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5220B346.6030606@libertytrek.org> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:59:18 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] where did lvm installation guide go? References: <87r4dcbisz.fsf@nyu.edu> <87sixschz7.fsf@nyu.edu> <87wqn4ar3w.fsf@nyu.edu> <52203746.3090203@gmail.com> <522046B3.3060209@gmail.com> <5220A68D.1080407@libertytrek.org> <5220AE1F.20601@libertytrek.org> <5220AE61.8030303@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5220AE61.8030303@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 747bd154-abce-44e3-bde7-3d1d1c3b6cf5 X-Archives-Hash: 8be16da27595b144a3a924ad53ef0c22 On 2013-08-30 10:38 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 30/08/2013 16:37, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Personally, I think it only 'makes sense' to put files critical to the >> boot process into /boot. > It's not the boot process. It's the startup-to-early-init process. > > Or put another way, the entire start process up to the point where all > of /usr is reliably available. > > "boot" is used here as very loose slang Understood and point taken, but I think my point remains nevertheless...