From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D5E1381F3 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7083E0DD0; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F008E0D91 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E67EAE070 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 06:56:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=z97BvAu9aVhDgIBqRbmc++fneoo=; b=c3sZTyKnmFIq SkIVsbVSBMAxOxp2c1wM64Ags26jNoyb+wPTW+RgHYJirF8jNQFNZdMxD9dyQOIg vrX7KfjQkEx9NKDluq1TZK/EhD/pVIgFjG6FGJPV2aAbeU+mD5tDf4nh8wadr2O4 REOIBUD3lGIoePnoY5EN75zAoXYy7EY= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a91.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F366DAE069 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 06:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5220A48C.3000104@libertytrek.org> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:56:28 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 References: <87r4de964d.fsf@nyu.edu> <521DD947.10904@libertytrek.org> <20130828122444.2bfff8cf@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130828122444.2bfff8cf@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d5df3e26-9daa-4afb-be8f-ea849ad1de08 X-Archives-Hash: 9fc387018d38cc0ce4e07cc3d0d44a07 On 2013-08-28 7:24 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:04:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable??? > > Give it a chance! It's only just come out of rc. Until recently it > wasn't even available in testing without umasking. Ok, sorry, I totally missed the significance, didn't even notice that it meant it had come out of RC. I was just going by the fact that it has been around for - what, years? - with never-ending beta/rc releases, and I just thought this was another new rc or something... So, glad to hear it might actually be getting close now... :)