From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6EB1381F3 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7B8CE0C14; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F24E0C18 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id d7so2145012bkh.12 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:10:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0sU2maAsf2ZptmfDOZ3scq1f+3D2pkJXFNKv/F02s0I=; b=O24lr7zPsTmGgqe3PqlCAvzNjyvvS8S0l1K6ErGnoKBWWMqWwA8s1XCVpsw6b+2IEI BriC1LDLC1rdtYoCvKj76nKCEjlnoDzGMrQP/wFy/xW2LLdGtialRNHHQtr/pIByo3t2 ffBlm8j6tYH+9FZatfL7EW37ubmEtUQhj7lKsqjCjhDA+AXSykKq2N6w026ml355Swv7 5A2nRLWGgbOnUbLBB8LDMLn9xl8ixvdmM+2k85XDnhxKBmb0PmbXpS9Rvj/8zo8lWteA G4sxnb7nivfGAOAjpPIjS9Q0po552KL4+YkcZfQb+jKrgi99agdxBlXiYy/LUXPfKqft Q52g== X-Received: by 10.204.238.136 with SMTP id ks8mr902161bkb.32.1377688226427; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.41] (196-210-127-149.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.127.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm5746794bkn.12.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <521DD9CC.3030204@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:06:52 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130809 Thunderbird/17.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 References: <87r4de964d.fsf@nyu.edu> <521DD947.10904@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: <521DD947.10904@libertytrek.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 79fe8cd3-b699-4a77-aa5a-1e12b0c4fc04 X-Archives-Hash: f55c4d020c178a3d0cfee078be0436fd On 28/08/2013 13:04, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-08-27 5:27 PM, gottlieb@nyu.edu wrote: >> I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in >> testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree). >> >> Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands >> from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several readers have >> used 2.2 for years with success. > > So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable??? > 100+ alpha/beta releases 200+ rc releases what do you think? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com