From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150161-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6EB1381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:10:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7B8CE0C14;
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F24E0C18
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:10:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id d7so2145012bkh.12
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=0sU2maAsf2ZptmfDOZ3scq1f+3D2pkJXFNKv/F02s0I=;
b=O24lr7zPsTmGgqe3PqlCAvzNjyvvS8S0l1K6ErGnoKBWWMqWwA8s1XCVpsw6b+2IEI
BriC1LDLC1rdtYoCvKj76nKCEjlnoDzGMrQP/wFy/xW2LLdGtialRNHHQtr/pIByo3t2
ffBlm8j6tYH+9FZatfL7EW37ubmEtUQhj7lKsqjCjhDA+AXSykKq2N6w026ml355Swv7
5A2nRLWGgbOnUbLBB8LDMLn9xl8ixvdmM+2k85XDnhxKBmb0PmbXpS9Rvj/8zo8lWteA
G4sxnb7nivfGAOAjpPIjS9Q0po552KL4+YkcZfQb+jKrgi99agdxBlXiYy/LUXPfKqft
Q52g==
X-Received: by 10.204.238.136 with SMTP id ks8mr902161bkb.32.1377688226427;
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.0.41] (196-210-127-149.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.127.149])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm5746794bkn.12.1969.12.31.16.00.00
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <521DD9CC.3030204@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:06:52 +0200
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130809 Thunderbird/17.0.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64
References: <87r4de964d.fsf@nyu.edu> <521DD947.10904@libertytrek.org>
In-Reply-To: <521DD947.10904@libertytrek.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 79fe8cd3-b699-4a77-aa5a-1e12b0c4fc04
X-Archives-Hash: f55c4d020c178a3d0cfee078be0436fd
On 28/08/2013 13:04, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-27 5:27 PM, gottlieb@nyu.edu <gottlieb@nyu.edu> wrote:
>> I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
>> testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).
>>
>> Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
>> from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several readers have
>> used 2.2 for years with success.
>
> So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable???
>
100+ alpha/beta releases
200+ rc releases
what do you think?
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com