From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A41D1381F3 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B65A21C01A; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C33AE109E for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z12so1369113ghb.12 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:54:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hMe5h4OMWwr4O/Hl7sqZt/ER338C2ELBJuP/pPwYOfg=; b=HTnTmIV/OaLS8m5+rnapQ3FgxsiRc1QNjZ5nL18g7M1Y8EbicKtZ5/QSlDED+9pZW2 prjn7QeV/BEx9Lpx6yy9XFzXJHw8rCx7pe41VksH+QadUjN2uVHT6S3A6rHg5oHkJD9w FN3Mybf9AhuBpdFBDUBYPJF1srUJRn+T7KRjfL6/vhioGOsiZ/UAZ+wdaQ8VwBuLPAgp amADl6hupJU3jAHW0MM6fObYTUkrQRv0L3rs/If2sHXC43yXO+0+Cwb5iUXnfMgcjxKu VJhyXV44rQloqy2cYX7FDfH1ff5o7RRFUsYd2oxu1PxoNReGA8VqMJykAjvVwMu8VzFh pnDg== X-Received: by 10.236.15.162 with SMTP id f22mr22642103yhf.23.1377640466182; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-149-115.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.149.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s46sm2130021yha.27.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <521D2010.4030805@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:54:24 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 SeaMonkey/2.20 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 References: <87r4de964d.fsf@nyu.edu> In-Reply-To: <87r4de964d.fsf@nyu.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 931ecd68-aa04-4b4c-b4aa-3f789071c0f7 X-Archives-Hash: 12f400a7ad5eaf55b70531e7439c8770 gottlieb@nyu.edu wrote: > I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in > testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree). > > Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands > from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several readers have > used 2.2 for years with success. > > thanks, > allan > > I use unstable here and the only difference I have seen is the addition of more options, better handling of blocks and such as that. I would upgrade and then give the man page a good looking over. You may find some things there that interest you and may be helpful in some situations. I don't recall any commands changing tho. Still emerge and such. Hope that helps. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!