From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D81381F3 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FCDDE0CAA; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116BBE0C18 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-5d823118.pool.mediaWays.net [93.130.49.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B200F33EC1D for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52163779.90809@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:08:25 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130813 Thunderbird/17.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Jitsi or Other Skype Alternative References: <20130820151232.GA2420@artifex> <52163318.7010106@marc-stuermer.de> <52163518.7010209@gentoo.org> <521636D9.7040808@marc-stuermer.de> In-Reply-To: <521636D9.7040808@marc-stuermer.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 7f313bfc-c920-49e2-b2c2-ec31da260bfd X-Archives-Hash: fed65b2003b972e22139bac85ccbdce8 On 08/22/2013 06:05 PM, Marc Stürmer wrote: > Am 22.08.2013 17:58, schrieb hasufell: > >> You probably missed those hundreds of bugs we devs and also users were >> faced with, including linkage against non-existing sonames, random >> crashes and breakage when the binary is stripped. >> >> So this is somewhat wrong information. It's like saying windows works >> right out of the box without problems. > > I am not arguing from the admin site of Skype; I am arguing from the > user side. I was arguing from both sides. It is buggy, crashes a lot, consumes a lot of ressources and is able to slow down your whole desktop, mess with audio settings and whatnot.