From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149795-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C53B1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:59:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7CECE0FC5;
	Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1FB4E0FB8
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:59:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id en1so3912757wid.12
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=H2sHf7ZyZm7L20fTHLF4mg7yfwKAAFXVZOiTAFWzG8U=;
        b=k7U7i6hpGrtzmNHXWGwHxj5cl603UicRROUxk9wp3meqE9Gh7SxCJv/ANBKDRQ6NfK
         cCGCgFyK2j128bZD015UZTjR1QliA+4HZM2s6CuyRoAnJTXMT2/nEkwvrsCMqpvys9yK
         N+TLI5PWkluwHZZz9Sk/omYc35k6sObyPw/55RGQjqLS4in4+6fq9x4G5O/SrbCv62Ys
         H4su7xuNTD2m0zwdFRVMODy5WqsCe8XSiOZ1X6LO3Ef8AkeFhprFgRNLOkfeV4nbNbBp
         MnGoGTYTmaF2S56xGXilgMRY75rTwaBLVi8KKq4uvKoNT72iYdXbaT+z3huwOdIFYstH
         HUmA==
X-Received: by 10.194.234.100 with SMTP id ud4mr149160wjc.44.1376978344300;
        Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.20.201] (dustpuppy.is.co.za. [196.14.169.11])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eb3sm21243071wic.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <521304DF.1060107@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:55:43 +0200
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130809 Thunderbird/17.0.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Optional /usr merge in Gentoo
References: <CAGbLXuV1PpjP5=M8zPD6qiEdMBjQjaZh8y-HyA+ZwYE-PHSrEg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGbLXuUFeSWgvtWBJ7V-_VycBT4+=A1TGoOtv6=eUjbJTeMmXA@mail.gmail.com> <5211226F.2000000@libertytrek.org> <201308182208.43780.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <521142A7.1020702@coolmail.se> <52114F82.5070608@gmail.com> <5211E5DE.2050901@coolmail.se> <0F75235D-4558-4BF8-ADF8-43A480014F4B@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20130819115543.44ac32d5@digimed.co.uk> <b0095dea9c9ed475bd752c7b5fa2e701.squirrel@www.antarean.org> <5212C27E.2020609@gmail.com> <17650cec-93eb-40b7-af3c-dd0156ecdd6f@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <17650cec-93eb-40b7-af3c-dd0156ecdd6f@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: ae49321a-06d3-4bc7-bc4a-10e86c7c9a9a
X-Archives-Hash: bffeb45dc6aa031246b850861e950e04

On 20/08/2013 06:00, joost@antarean.org wrote:
> Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>     J. Roeleveld wrote:
> 
>         On Mon, August 19, 2013 12:55, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> 
>             On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:17:06 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> 
>                 Here's a short, very in-comprehensive list of software
>                 we are aware
>                 of that currently are not able to provide the full set
>                 of functionality
>                 when /usr is split off and not pre-mounted at boot:
>                 udev-pci-db/udev-usb-db and all rules depending on this
>                 (using the
>                 PCI/USB database in /usr/share), PulseAudio, NetworkManager,
>                 ModemManager, udisks, libatasmart, usb_modeswitch,
>                 gnome-color-manager,
>                 usbmuxd, ALSA, D-Bus, CUPS, Plymouth, LVM, hplip,
>                 multipath, Argyll,
>                 VMWare, the locale logic of most programs and a lot of
>                 other stuff. [1]
> 
>             How much of that is needed before the contents of /etc/fstab are
>             mounted? I certainly don't need to run a desktop, used a 3G
>             modem, play
>             sounds or load a virtual machine before then. Yes, LVM may
>             be needed, but
>             the needed parts are in /sbin anyway, so that is a red
>             herring too.
> 
>         It is a red herring.
>         I currently use an initramfs, but that is because I decided to
>         put "/" on
>         LVM as well.
>         When I had "/" as a normal partition and /usr on LVM, there were
>         no issues
>         with booting. Currently, with the initramfs, I get errors about
>         / and /usr
>         not being able to umount during shutdown.
> 
>         --
>         Joost
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     I to have / on a traditional partition, ext4, and /boot on a small ext2
>     partition.  Everything else is on LVM.  I don't want a init thingy
>     either.  I had nightmares with that
>     thing when I used Mandrake years
>     ago.  I can't recall the name of that thing that left me with no
>     keyboard/mouse but I still remember that init thingy.  Dang, what was
>     that thing that did that?  Anyway, as bad a taste as that other thing
>     left, the init thingy is even worse.  I still remember the init thingy
>     10 YEARS later.  The other thing was a few years ago. 
> 
>     I bet Alan remembers.  I was plenty pissed.  That is likely the most
>     pissed I ever been on this list.  If that guy had been in front of me,
>     I'd be in jail.  I got to many trees around here.  O-o
> 
>     Dale
> 
>     :-)  :-) 
> 
> 
> I also still remember.
> Not going to mention it now. But will give a hint.
> What is the name of the computer that said: "I'm sorry Dale, I can't let
> you do that."?


bwahahahaha :-)

Yes, we all remember Dale's troubles with that thing a few years ago.

2001 was a good move and a good book too (just finished both again as it
turns out). 2010 doesn't quite match up though...

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com