From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FF81381F3 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2680FE0C33; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1301BE0C17 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE6D208063 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:25:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=yyQo5Rtl8zv0ejvBuTBZJI0Uavs=; b=nhmGcuIbP4k2 NCXpnScKQe9DVj+lvGY9O0SLJkKiPODKHDb9Y3eb6RvkmeBm/3F6FFAsxkz5duAt +fDkWBdyrw9DchC/Kk88FTBoIdOS6wGQj6GU3YBs7aSR5Uy8lkCqrtGnfmHSDuSr I9OSdnU+Ps20fReouAlhm86NCNN8IuY= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a57.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67687208058 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <521122CB.4010003@libertytrek.org> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:38:51 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo References: <520A5446.1050001@mail.ru> <520DA782.4050803@sporkbox.us> <520F6333.70301@dmj.nu> <9716EEEB-144F-47AA-A828-FC9A508CE9FA@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <521090F5.4090305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <521090F5.4090305@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4c2e6de8-d715-4cbd-acf0-d079f9ae6d5c X-Archives-Hash: c8f6e706953e85279ed5f340fa7847ee On 2013-08-18 5:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > While we're on the topic, what's the obsession with having different > bits of the file hierarchy as different*mount points*? That harks back > to the days when the only way to have a chunk of fs space be different > was to have it as a separate physical thing and mount it. Nowadays we > have something better - ZFS. To me this makes so much more sense. I have > a large amount of storage called a pool, and set size limits and > characteristics for various directories without having to deal with > fixed size volumes. Eh? *Who* has ZFS? Certainly not the linux kernel.