From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB131381F3 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AF4CE0AA4; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A42E0A92 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so1893677eek.3 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:58:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q0zl6blVj7LX1UmBO0thPGCP2bGjUKKOrz3o1Nf7b04=; b=e3CUYkDU4LGaR35PL8qDWYCJG9MMnaTgyf+Rnv4tZq9qfmwjHGe9CslDKhOr5BlvMF gb3w/O8A04EbirLrLzuUNVNM32eAubBYQh4ifNRnJaJqEM5SgyldIQ0qt0aTN3rDlLsL K0CdWO4E8JG1lRmX62qi5pLKvnnkrXUymfEj6FfEl65KEFehVS3Anj00M5pzzQ37/khd CENS3K9AgZgc35xHYyAmwf1JvHkTRPBvaHpMY0Fuytk1rwieuuv3/cQyy/2i1zrR15Yr TXDeRdSzUDeUwg2JxqWX6dzCvJ9ar7MLEjHMUuD5XMkVP54vImlb6dbkhGYGiVsfG0uz TeUQ== X-Received: by 10.14.180.4 with SMTP id i4mr18285819eem.148.1375739912049; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.41] (196-210-102-70.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.102.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a4sm1762174eez.0.2013.08.05.14.58.30 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52001F61.2090501@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 23:55:45 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130802 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SLES or gentoo ... ? References: <52001700.5070401@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: <52001700.5070401@xunil.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 42d86b39-b3cc-4974-a860-6e1baf7afb08 X-Archives-Hash: 443218c643b5aac8a04bca557ea595ef On 05/08/2013 23:20, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > ! Pls don't flame me :-) ! > > Don't misunderstand ... I happily trust gentoo on most of my customers > servers. > > A customer of mine chose SLES 10 back then to run a VMware-Server > installation (1.0.x back then) because they had some big > company-license-pool available. > > That server is to be replaced and I asked them if they still want to use > SLES because of that. Answer: no ... no more licenses available/paid. > > So they asked me for alternatives and I told them about gentoo. > > My question: > > how would you guys compare the 2 choices to report it back to them? > > People buy stuff like SLES to get/feel the feeling that all the choice > and review of changes is done for them .... we didn't need one > support-call in the last few years. And the gentoo-community is a > helpful and competent one (yes, thank you!). > > So I tend to do the job with gentoo ... better they pay my work than > some never-used support-contract ;-) > > I just plan to use stable gentoo there, be conservative with changes and > keep the system up-to-date regularly ... as I use ~amd64 on my main > machines I think I am rather informed about any *bigger* or problematic > upgrades. > > It's gonna be a QEMU/KVM-host .. this and some rather powerful server > should speed up those smallish and dusty VMs. > > Any thoughts? How to professionally deploy gentoo linux as a one-man-show? > > ;-) > > Best regards, Stefan > I despise SLES intensely[1]. Even more than Windows. So this may be biased. The primary question as I see it is Who will maintain this installation? If the answer is you and 1|2 guys you train yourself, by all means go right ahead and use gentoo. You already know it well so the quality of service you offer a customer is likely to be better than if you went say Centos. If the answer is you plus other guys but you don't know who they are or how good they are or if you get to train them, then gentoo starts getting risky. You don't want a gentoo box where the admin is the "emerge world && reboot" and walk away kind of guy. I think you fall in the first class. And our Infrastructure team has also never had to log a VMware service call. Our managed service team that faces clients - very different story and not applicable here. I find that gentoo does not scale well in corporates where machines are a mix of everything. It takes too much brain power to update them. It also doesn't work well if you have to give admin rights to people of little skill. Where gentoo shines is - small installs that need something none standard - large pools of identical hosts that are somehow non-standard so you get to build what you want once and deploy it many times - embedded. Your tools let you automate the build end-to-end [1] A predecessor used SLES 9 & 10 for everything coz he thought it was awesome. Nothing could ever get updated as it was always manual, SuSEconfig kept biting us in the teeth hard and it was just awful for anyone used to working on *nix at any leveol. Fine for Windows admins moving over though... -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com