From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFJcR-0005dx-QW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:32:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0B5EE0AF7; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E986E0AF4 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so480797fga.14 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:31:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VIy5saVGb1hHAC1us7vdRD65kuCnb4VPDYu3If1JOro=; b=IKlr3y5tA9TIF8gmvgM7wyjRZ/V2o+Rk4glYsiJmRrQrZ3/6fJ4jHjV3uGg7UxflukvQEPo50b0raPgKSP4Xr7bOLNra8DiRYsz0rPdlfuOkmS+kyBLj7nYBwy1JPbxtV9DLjFXLbQc99df/qKqgdd5ajpGM3SaGMt/6a4cRQjY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eROJ3974jjvpMcWc96l6MmiDk94l0i8Fq62dVvnCjlLOyZl5Bw05kkiqsWg8e5lwu4vU5cigY+5EnjvlaxMtUuJiomYKVKTqS7i3vkL+Eq5RZIGDTFL8SqqQfNRuCNgjZkZDmOzuSHYcmb5Ccj4Ull4jU50j/2Y3WnwaHL7+JBM= Received: by 10.86.84.5 with SMTP id h5mr1352378fgb.27.1200533496649; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:31:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.63.2 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:31:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51e438da0801161731x7effba8fy4928ae8c8b32ea65@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:01:36 +0530 From: Holla To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Routing problem ? In-Reply-To: <478E72CD.8070607@badapple.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <51e438da0801101736j4e0f1f01lccf0d27817909942@mail.gmail.com> <51e438da0801130312q6a358be9lb9532db63234cf71@mail.gmail.com> <20080113140652.1c81cde9.hilse@web.de> <200801161222.32688.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <478E72CD.8070607@badapple.net> X-Archives-Salt: b3648943-1f9a-4675-ade0-b4dc5e48946b X-Archives-Hash: 5fc8b352fc224d4684c89c624a3bd557 On Jan 17, 2008 2:40 AM, kashani wrote: > Mick wrote: > > > I agree that this is not related to the ISP. What you probably need to do is > > set up RIP2 in your router 1, to be able to recognize other subdomains > > (192.168.2.XXX). Then it'll process packets coming from that subdomain. The > > router manual ought to help you out on setting this up. > > > Sure let's make something simple really complicated. And sucky. > > > Is there some sort of dynamic routing happening on this network? > Different possible paths to get to machines? Links we might want to > balance traffic over? Other routers sending route updates? If not, then > why would we want the added complexity of a routing protocol? There are > all of two routes on this network and they never change. Static routing > is the right choice and functionally no different than if the route had > been inserted via a routing protocol. > > No routing protocol will make router1 NAT addresses it doesn't want to. > Adding that subnet to the NAT list will, but that is outside the routing > table or it would have already worked. Well, I had earlier tried enabling the RIP2 option in Router1 but no change in results. For the moment I have given up on this configuration. I am now trying to setup up the network as one segment only 192.168.1.x.. Using the Router2 in client mode is one option. Thanks for all the respones.. Sathish -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list