From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F381381F3 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE27EE09C9; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90EC8E085B for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id mz10so162246bkb.3 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 04:21:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R0Xr6PnWn5xZ5+dR2qDVN445VE+ewj1fl42Quovkz0w=; b=WP4EFWJwfQpMJ+xoUMMNbilelzKPX2dUaFKAIyJjTUZdM9ksKvYtrfAvwhcnM23mK2 O2piyP+3UeORzgv4uz7JRwqvBl05Mn84KNErIiaRO37kA8be+RFWlYRFxc7IvF6Ij89f Rv6PG8X/bFCFnyKYZPQpFqoSR9BQRzN4w1kQ8+fD2S633hrKSXCws5YoXFZBP7q6/kPp vXtXCo4INldr5LiVv0Ul2f5xfV3ijJKaAT7i0y/XkLTadRclH1OhCuRb6KrIZzKmrO9k T0ufgHkbAbDENvR9h34BJ/MjW3EmLgnZYt3vzRvK/aLOLtME4HS8yfW+ydCbOf1y4ZUA fqAA== X-Received: by 10.204.175.141 with SMTP id ba13mr1119282bkb.115.1375442497116; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 04:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p57B54AAC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.181.74.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id od6sm1779900bkb.11.2013.08.02.04.21.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Aug 2013 04:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51FB963F.702@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:21:35 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130714 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Freeze after suspend-to-ram with kernel 3.10 References: <20130802104742.GA2423@methusalix> In-Reply-To: <20130802104742.GA2423@methusalix> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: e5a6ca03-5a1e-49ca-b049-c785d04934b1 X-Archives-Hash: 0f01c56951719a573e98b0d7cd324799 Am 02.08.2013 12:47, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger: > Hey list > > My netbook doesn't freeze so often during operation any more. But now it’s > started to not properly wake up from suspend-to-ram. It’s like with my big > laptop: when that one runs on nouveau instead of nvidia-drivers, it behaves > the very same way, i.e. I switch it on and the screen stays blank. Not even > sysrq are working then, only hard power-down. > > I tried to confirm my oberservation by deliberately hibernating it multiple > times yesterday -- it always woke up with 3.9. Now I booted it with 3.10 and > it didn't come up on the first try. > Do you have any suggestion how I might debug this? I can’t simply report to > kernel blokes “3.10 is crap on my netbook, you put in a regression somewhere”. > > I don’t really have the time right now to go after hunches, such as the new > tikless system, as building a kernel takes up to 45 minutes on that thing. well, take your 3.9 config and don't change it.