From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C161381F3 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92A77E09F5; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f50.google.com (mail-yh0-f50.google.com [209.85.213.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D287E09B5 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id a41so85993yho.37 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:48:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=32LN2KRJSjNa9cA6IT+vL5cEzWb4mPYzDMtNOS8Bj3Q=; b=bfdoGe5uW8M5LTcPqae9FNyw3E7NRXNd2nmwJ/e5DhCUHRb1BTNi2DJ6uIwibE2I+N n7om+9vQYblcSpsxmF8XxaJIOJDoCBxlwVtHdL2Ws3WfQnfNvq+404PDYwCnKwdUHQNB DTJUOl0Nr8Tt82pu/UsFTGzUSeG4fs7xKe0sJ+sietFmAAPhNJazr5Cj7bn2UQMQIbgb p4TaDDCSSsAkkuOsqJmo+xJF2pIzSXvLFFEcYcPJ2+NcLnZcULOPacTnCul+21bdw6Tb LAq4Gv8Dno/FZhVR+YO8Uii6Bggg5oQzpozG0Fc3zEMDwYcVrpaoeMu/IHNetoYfvhRv Rykg== X-Received: by 10.236.222.3 with SMTP id s3mr2765234yhp.213.1375411703648; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-122-60.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.122.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n28sm9070443yhn.0.2013.08.01.19.48.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51FB1DF5.8050802@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:48:21 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0 SeaMonkey/2.19 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev References: <51FA8CB6.60000@libertytrek.org> <51FAEEC6.9000006@iinet.net.au> <51FAF26C.2040107@gentoo.org> <20130802010100.GA31096@waltdnes.org> <51FB133F.3040409@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <51FB133F.3040409@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 61712880-91ef-41e4-86c6-b70d6c479220 X-Archives-Hash: a247fbd934d85f8b92d061d034515c28 Samuli Suominen wrote: > > Huh? USE="firmware-loader" is optional and enabled by default in > sys-fs/udev > Futhermore predictable network interface names work as designed, not a > single valid bug filed about them. > > Stop spreading FUD. > > Looking forward to lastrite sys-fs/eudev just like > sys-apps/module-init-tools already was removed as unnecessary later on. > > So your real agenda is to kill eudev? Maybe it is you that is spreading FUD instead of others. Like others have said, udev was going to cause issues, eudev has yet to cause any. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!