From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DAA1381F3 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EDCBE0ABB; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (mail-vb0-f47.google.com [209.85.212.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36844E09D2 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h10so2666937vbh.6 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:49:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jJRtVAq5yVVW/0Os4vY6Mx435HrNvt3/8PY4PmBdMKg=; b=S9AH0MaZs/PO008tZnhoCuqRYMYjAP2jFReuaeQdnHdjrWwUR6Z9picm7kJxiJ+rYM K8ss3LJJGRbuQyifcNk5UhO79GqVNFSqEpMhFxzB8cj72Snz0B/2WsGCWYCNaf6+xZV5 WLTh5FplqrrCMbvF//DdDuuTWefY6t/aFmhcKQaBa2BnCP0/piuH9zXQSC6jrDFBeEvb RHI4G7uK2cXRrnVOWdUJfXKiYx0m3QMf+B7ljVy1rC5fG/pouNrx27dxgC3o8VIhssLq 7mVktp9J4q9XBdG3wF2slcGUH1ZfMZv+0kWlaRzcdSZ3XUWOYfYUfBKa/C4S5kb7BU3/ 38EA== X-Received: by 10.220.95.201 with SMTP id e9mr1099334vcn.71.1375393792412; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-122-60.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.122.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kk6sm2826292vdb.5.2013.08.01.14.49.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51FAD7FE.1030101@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:49:50 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0 SeaMonkey/2.19 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev References: <51FA8CB6.60000@libertytrek.org> <51FAD4A0.2040202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <51FAD4A0.2040202@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 899f9a85-6d58-4c24-957f-664516d527b7 X-Archives-Hash: b233a333016617180c406dac2b086eca Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 01/08/13 19:28, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs >> systemd thread. >> >> I have an older server that I have been putting off this update, >> debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev. >> >> I've googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me >> find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from udev to eudev. >> >> The eudev project page is sparse, to say the least. >> >> Anyone? >> > > First of all, eudev only has IUSE="rule-generator" that is backported > from udev-171. > It's otherwise same in users point of view with sys-fs/udev, except > sys-fs/eudev is constantly out of date and the code forwarding from > upstream is not very reliable process. > Futhermore sys-fs/udev is not 'old' but it's the new one and will be > the default for OpenRC for long as OpenRC is in Portage. > I don't want to bash anything or anybody but sys-fs/eudev as-is in the > Portage is currently useless and a bit buggy. > > That's odd. I been using eudev since like the second version that came out and have had zero issues with it. Ask anyone here, if it had a problem, I'd be found it by now. lol Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!