From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233C91381F3 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC2FFE0932; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f51.google.com (mail-yh0-f51.google.com [209.85.213.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD538E077F for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l109so1617690yhq.38 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 02:53:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=WaGv7E8kORfJs2z7DmXrRae0cd55h/CCf0kdYM7/7k4=; b=uq5BGTPHspH3+42oFFqQk176/KJtwPy80RApt5LINfPWChKVhiX6QNjcLUD3H8tYfS 1b/+CaTpkE/iFGuZJ0vCe4WgbW0ZsZQ6smA4SYDCe9HXeZ9et3b6D44MPjPAbiflkV3K oDsN7NNT52FAVw/+GkgEJ5eOxOLq6nPwNd5UqPj8gqrwbT2IVSVndOFZBQku64uKgEn5 DFYCcy/tpFRdo7V1jCA+kbolI4uDTXBAkgWh5oeibouR5w1/mqdcychbd56ombs9dQ+f 7J17Dy+unXnq/Cs43b/zztu7Kh4ruvYojyxMbmRveEhdxFByuSjPzSB/JN4N3o2mxzWu b6yw== X-Received: by 10.236.1.5 with SMTP id 5mr8967792yhc.155.1372499630747; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 02:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-51.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.120.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l67sm17786975yhc.26.2013.06.29.02.53.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Jun 2013 02:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51CEAEAB.4060002@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 04:53:47 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2 compile error. Clock_gettime References: <51CA7510.6000107@gmail.com> <51CA7A0F.7060505@gentoo.org> <51CA8AB6.8050500@gmail.com> <51CA8F0E.6040608@gentoo.org> <51CC328B.6070008@gmail.com> <20130629015912.GB19743@waltdnes.org> <51CE4A12.7060106@gmail.com> <20130629102704.5e160dce@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130629102704.5e160dce@digimed.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070106080908000406010702" X-Archives-Salt: 0d98f8ae-1e9e-4832-abab-4a43649a8ae2 X-Archives-Hash: 696400484be01be626c492eb55a38b11 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070106080908000406010702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:44:34 -0500, Dale wrote: > >>> Other comments note that unsetting "static" allows it to build. Try >>> unsetting the "static" flag for lvm2 in package.use, i.e... >>> >>> sys-fs/lvm2 -static >>> >>> Does that build for you? > >> It might would but I can't recall WHY I set it to that. If I set it >> that way in package.use, which is rare for me, then I had to have a good >> reason. I need to start making notes on this stuff. ;-) > > You need static if you are using lvm in an initramfs. Whatever the > reason, if you remove it the ebuild that told you to add it in the first > place will remind you next time you update @world. > > Now that you mention it, it may have been when the separate /usr init thingy was going on that I had to add it. That could be it. Well, if I have to upgrade before they have a fix, I'll give it a shot and see what happens. I suspect it will be fixed at some point and most likely in the next update anyway. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! --------------070106080908000406010702 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:44:34 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>>> Other comments note that unsetting "static" allows it to build. Try
>>> unsetting the "static" flag for lvm2 in package.use, i.e...
>>>
>>> sys-fs/lvm2 -static
>>>
>>> Does that build for you?
>
>> It might would but I can't recall WHY I set it to that. If I set it
>> that way in package.use, which is rare for me, then I had to have a good
>> reason. I need to start making notes on this stuff. ;-)
>
> You need static if you are using lvm in an initramfs. Whatever the
> reason, if you remove it the ebuild that told you to add it in the first
> place will remind you next time you update @world.
>
>

Now that you mention it, it may have been when the separate /usr init thingy was going on that I had to add it. That could be it. Well, if I have to upgrade before they have a fix, I'll give it a shot and see what happens. I suspect it will be fixed at some point and most likely in the next update anyway.

Dale

:-) :-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

--------------070106080908000406010702--