From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233571381F3 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1619DE0A53; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gh0-f170.google.com (mail-gh0-f170.google.com [209.85.160.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E24E0967 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z10so1541188ghb.1 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:16:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=Fr9NJH42Qy26SEuANxBSqSPQTL5LeRQwwl394748R4M=; b=HU3/zCZRPsKZ5m5PTKvqbDwZsWXmuRi7RZ3cEMwHCLWgTaHN2vwLC5JPppn8yQw+R+ AKH2KJkq6Iks4VzGDxNlUjBV+SSTZVocje+NN8NCcy6cMuf1G+MmwxrknptC1H+afsml EoU7ypw0VK75CbJ8+QHFnTcLVCe2a1QSdDKC8fX7Aik7XmFFsgPyYbKNqmpiB0bgxou4 t7xjS6BqgHbnFSf9GEDha8sVEUkq7vQEElstvizHyVZIs0ZX4S9o4rGyyYTg2TEoWVzq TR19XFzIg7f++E5lOHJbkb2ZkH6MftQf4l+hKJUkNqGW49ggsTD6YhpzMLEcNka25r4h KngA== X-Received: by 10.236.117.14 with SMTP id i14mr4757245yhh.154.1371730593983; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-56-107.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.56.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s65sm90782yhs.14.2013.06.20.05.16.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51C2F29F.1050306@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:16:31 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPython with Python3 - what magic am I missing? References: <1371713499.31486.0@numa-i> <51C2B3FC.5060304@fuuzetsu.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51C2B3FC.5060304@fuuzetsu.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050000000708040009020909" X-Archives-Salt: d4c5efc3-2289-4084-ba55-0075b027180b X-Archives-Hash: c55e3db09f99873bd29e46cff5988252 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050000000708040009020909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: > On 20/06/13 08:31, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > Hi, > > > I'd like start IPython with Python3 as underlying Python > > interpretor. GenToo has some magic to invoke IPython which I don't > > understand. > > > /usr/bin/ipython is a symlink to /usr/bin/python-exec which is a > > script invoking the binary /usr/bin/python-exec-c > > > I don't have Python3 as standard Python version (too dangerous with > > Portage?) > > Portage does just fine with Python3. In fact, it's actually faster (I > hear claims of upto 30% speed improvement but I haven't seen any data > nor tested it myself.). > Is there a way to tell portage to use python3 by default then? I have it here so maybe it is already using python3? Anyway to know? Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! --------------050000000708040009020909 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
> On 20/06/13 08:31, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I'd like start IPython with Python3 as underlying Python
> > interpretor. GenToo has some magic to invoke IPython which I don't
> > understand.
>
> > /usr/bin/ipython is a symlink to /usr/bin/python-exec which is a
> > script invoking the binary /usr/bin/python-exec-c
>
> > I don't have Python3 as standard Python version (too dangerous with
> >  Portage?)
>
> Portage does just fine with Python3. In fact, it's actually faster (I
> hear claims of upto 30% speed improvement but I haven't seen any data
> nor tested it myself.).
>


Is there a way to tell portage to use python3 by default then?  I have it here so maybe it is already using python3?  Anyway to know?

Dale


:-)  :-)


--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

--------------050000000708040009020909--